Quantcast
Channel: team
Viewing all 1477 articles
Browse latest View live

1) Time Management

$
0
0
No matter what path you choose in life, you’re going to be faced with some type of challenge that will cause you to question just about every choice you’ve made. Luckily, for most entrepreneurs, we’ve taught ourselves how to push through that. Unfortunately, though, we do still have things that bring us down at times. Here are 11 entrepreneur struggles that we have all faced at some point. Managing your time is one of the most important parts of working for yourself. If you are unable to manage your own time and tasks, how are you supposed to grow your business to a successful spot. Even the most successful entrepreneurs have had their time management skills challenged at some point, but thankfully, they took this challenge as a lesson and became a better person for mastering this skill. No matter what type of business you are running, you must be able to manage your time effectively. Yes, that does mean cutting tasks that are no longer worth your time. For example, if replying to emails consumes 40% of your work day, it’s time to look into delegating that task out to someone who might actually be more qualified to do that work for you. Time management is the top one of the 11 entrepreneur struggles. 2) Finding Customers What’s a business without customers? A hobby. All joking aside, if you’re running a business, you’re probably going to rely on having a decent number of customers coming through your doors, visiting your website, or subscribing to your services. Without these customers, your business doesn’t survive. The biggest challenge that we usually face at the beginning is finding how to reach these customers and how to get them to purchase your product/service. This is truly one of the hardest parts of starting a business, which makes this fall in at number two on our list of entrepreneur struggles. 3) Picking the Right Business When starting out, you are under the impression that your idea is the most important part of your success; however, you later begin to realize that your idea isn’t necessarily the key to success. Pool noodles have made someone a multi-millionaire, but some of the most innovative technology that could change the way we live everyday has flopped due to poor marketing. At the end of the day, yes, your idea is pretty important, but it is only a small percentage of what makes a business successful. Your implementation, marketing, and ability to serve matter much more than your idea. Unfortunately, most new entrepreneurs are heavily challenged at first with the incorrect thoughts of their idea being the number one most important thing. Overcoming this thought in your mind is a crucial part of success, which makes this one of the 11 entrepreneur struggles on our list. 4) Unsteady Income Something that so many people overlook is the fact that your income as an entrepreneur can change dramatically over the course of a month. We’ve had months where we’ve made 50% of what the previous month provided for us with income, and it is never an easy challenge to overcome. You have to be able to effectively manage your money when you are self-employed, due to the fact that if you are unable to, you will get screwed over when that time comes. It’s great to live it up when income is high, but when your income drops due to a decline in sales, cancelation in subscriptions, or lack of market interest after the initial launch, you can experience some truly tough choices as to where to head next. Plan ahead, and keep your business going. Having unsteady income is a difficult one on our list of 11 entrepreneur struggles, but it is necessary to build a better life over time. Looking to grow your income? Check out these tips on how to earn $100/day online! 5) Tax Season Just like planning for a decline in sales occasionally, you need to start preparing for next year’s tax season the moment your taxes are finished and paid. You never want to be one of the people who gets completely screwed over in tax season, just because you’re actually building something and providing a service. It makes no sense why self-employed income tax is so much higher, but because we are, you need to plan for it. Make sure you have enough saved to pay it off with ease, and make sure that you are deducting everything (and I mean everything) you can. Spend some extra money, and find a tax consultant/lawyer or accountant who knows what they’re doing! You could end up saving more than what you paid them, and it will take a ton of stress off your shoulders when you have questions. Pay someone to save you even more money. Trust us; this is extremely effective. Personally, I saved thousands last year from write-offs by having someone who knew what they were doing. So many entrepreneurs struggle with tax season when they start out, so we felt it was necessary to add this to our list of 11 entrepreneur struggles. 6) Social Acceptance Feeling accepted is something that most people have an overwhelming desire for. When you go down your own new path, though, that most people will never experience, you may start to feel like your friends no longer accept your choice. More often than not, you are bombarded with “friends” telling you all of these horror stories about people they have (only) heard of starting businesses and failing, only to end up where they were before they started the business. Truth be told, it’s bullshit. If your business fails, accept that and move along. At the very least, you will have learned something new that you never would have experienced before. It’s a hard part to accept, but it is always going to teach you a lesson. At some point, you will probably have to cut out the negative influences in your life. It may be hard to cut people you love, but it’s sometimes necessary for personal growth. Don’t worry about being accepted. Would you rather be accepted by other people or be accepted by yourself? A large number of new entrepreneurs are faced with this challenge, which is why this falls in at numbers 6 on our list of 11 entrepreneur struggles. 7) Competition Number seven on our list of 11 entrepreneur struggles is dealing with competition. When you’re just a consumer, you see competition as a good thing. It keep prices low, and it allows you to get better service when purchasing from a company. Competition for an entrepreneur, though, is a completely different story. While it keeps prices low for consumers, sometimes your competition can outprice you no matter how much you lower the price. Big businesses will do just about anything to get the sale, even if they lose money on one person. It’s why huge stores like Best Buy and Walmart will price-match. If they do this, they move inventory, make a sale, and move forward, even if they lose money on the product. Most smaller businesses, though, can’t afford this cost when starting out, which makes some customers feel the need to go to the competition to get a better deal. To compete with this, though, most of the time, you’ll get 10x better customer care at a smaller business than you will a big-box store. Keep in mind that “most of the time” is not all the time… Along with outpricing your business, your competitors also already has their own customers, ideas, suppliers, etc. The point here is that your competition is already establish, so you’re going to have to find ways to be better than them. If you’re going to charge a higher price, you’re going to be held to a higher standard. Fuck that standard. You need to go higher than what your customer expects, if you want to grow your business. I could talk about competition in this list of entrepreneur struggles, so I’ll just leave it with this. You have to be able to compete, even if your competitors do everything to try to overthrow you. Keep going — always. 8) The Rich Impression There seems to be this impression of entrepreneurs that we’re all loaded with millions in the bank, hundreds of thousands in the safe under the bed, and thousands in our wallets at any given time. While we would all love that, it’s just not the case. Yes, a lot of us do quite well for ourselves, but there are times where we’re strapped for cash with our money tied up in our business. There are months where our expenses outweigh our income. There are years where we take a loss on our tax forms. Trust me when I say this: it is a great life, but it is not filled with pools of money. Entrepreneurs often treat themselves to nice watches, cars, houses, and other materialistic items, but it’s because most of us have created a cashflow business. With that, we can also have all of that stuff and still have months where we just get by. Asking us for money is no different than asking anyone else for money. We’re normal people, but we’ve been given the stereotype of being loaded. Trust me, there are much worse stereotypes to be given, and I’m not complaining. I am, however, suggesting that maybe (if you ask people for money) you should consider why you chose them specifically. This is something that most entrepreneurs are faced with at some point in time, whether it’s from friends or family or strangers. That’s why “the rich impression” makes it to our list of 11 entrepreneur struggles. 9) Hiring The Right Employees Number 9 on our list of 11 entrepreneur struggles is all about hiring the right employees, which somewhat correlates to our number one biggest challenge that we listed; however, this is much more specific. When you first start hiring employees, you need to be able to ensure that they have your mission in mind. After all, these people are going to end up being a huge part of your company, and they could very well determine if you make it through a hard time in your business. Without the right employees by your side, you are going to flop quickly. Not only will these employees be able to hold your company strong and show your customers what they are valued at, but they will also allow you to focus on the bigger picture while they are working on the day-to-day activities. Believe it or not, it isn’t necessarily hard to attract amazing employees into your business. It all start with you. You must provide a place that challenges your employees to grow into a better person, not worry about income, and give them benefits they will love. No, you might not be able to provide the insanely awesome benefits that Google provide their employees, but you can provide enough to make their lives better, which will improve their focus and work ethic, in return making you more money. The higher value your team has in your company (monetary wise), the more benefits you should be giving them, even if it’s simple things. Truthfully, pay only goes so far. Make sure that you are building a team that has a strong desire to succeed and grow. Hire people who want to do something to make a difference in the community or world, and I promise that within no time you’ll have a strong team beside you — not behind you. So many entrepreneurs struggle with hiring because they are looking just for someone to do the work, not help build and move the company forward. Don’t be afraid to ever listen to what your team has to say. We often are afraid to give up some control, and because of that, we also end up losing opportunity. That’s why this is such a huge part of our list of 11 entrepreneur struggles. 10) Limiting Beliefs (Self-Doubt) If you’re looking to fail, make sure that you have plenty limiting beliefs… These little things inside your head will bring you and your business down so quickly that you won’y even have time to realize what is happening, if they go undetected. Self-doubt is truly like a disease in most ways, but the good thing is, you can get rid of this with your mind. Listen, everyone has limiting beliefs at some point in their life, even if they don’t recognize it, but when you’re running a business, it is vital to the success of it that you shut out this doubt as soon as it comes through your head. This could be anything from “that’s impossible” to “I don’t know how to…”. It doesn’t matter if you think it’s impossible, because I promise that one day, someone will do it. It doesn’t matter if you don’t know how to do something, because I promise someone is teaching how it’s done. No matter what your doubt is, it can be fixed with a positive attitude and mindset. 90% of your success in business is all about having the right mindset to make it through your challenges and take advantages of opportunity. Likewise, though, this is also the reason that 90% of people fail — they don’t think they can do it. I can say with confidence that everyone who has failed has simply allowed themselves to do so because they were not able to have control over their thoughts. This is the time where some will say that’s not true and that finances can cause a business to fail. You would be correct, but not 100% correct. Ask yourself this: why did the finances not work out for them? Most of the time, it’s because the founder got so caught up in the mindset that it couldn’t happen; therefore, they shut down their mind from finding a way to make it happen. These limiting beliefs will bring you do quicker than anything, so you need to be able to pinpoint thoughts that do not serve you, and counteract them with a positive thought. Sound ridiculous? Good. You’re not here to settle for average and safe. You’re here to better yourself and live a life most never will. Self-doubt is a huge part of failure, which actually our last point in our list of 11 entrepreneur struggles. 11) Failure As I mentioned before, you have to be able to look at failure as a lesson. You need to be able to see the good in the bad if you want to grow to a new level and achieve success. I promise that every bad situation, no matter how awful it feels at first, has a good and positive side to it, along with a lesson to be learned. Look at it from a third-person perspective, and try to see if you can find what the good is. This will help you conquer this fear from being one the the 11 entrepreneur struggles you face. Either way, failure is going to happen at some point. In fact, it’s probably going to happen quite a lot throughout your journey. So before you hold yourself back from chasing your dream because of your fear of failing, think about this. A child doesn’t learn to walk if they’re afraid of falling. Likewise, though, learning to walk changes their life forever — and for the better. The same thing can be applied into business. Once you get over that mountain, you will see the valley of success. It may take a lot of effort and time, but it is always worth it. No matter what you go through, you have to get over the fear of failing. This is truly one of the most important of the 11 entrepreneur struggles that we listed. If anything, kick this fear before you do any of the other 10. So there you have it! Those are the most common 11 entrepreneur struggles that we all face at some point in this journey. What struggles did we forget in our list? Let us know in the comments, and give some ways to overcome those challenges. Check out more of our awesome content at our blog. http://Blog.Achievable.xyz
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1200/1*uMc1c8RrITUrlL-aF6IRSA.png

OFFF FESTIVAL 2016 — BARCELONA — Medium

$
0
0
OFFF FESTIVAL 2016 — BARCELONA Another year has past and we were lucky enough to attend another OFFF Festival in the sunny city of Barcelona. Spread over 3 days, OFFF festival is held at the beautiful Disseny Hub Barcelona, attracts thousands of local and international designers from all backgrounds and brings together some of the design industry’s top talent to share their knowledge, experiences, work and inspire the audience. This year the audience were treated to the likes of the 80s retro style inspired James White aka Signalnoise, the one & only Paula Scher from Pentagram, the lyrically gifted & cheeky illustrator Mr Bingo, the digital power house of Sid Lee and even a gig with some insane live coded visuals by OFFF festival’s godfather & creative coder Joshua Davis alongside the incredibly talented & former M.I.A drummer Kiran Gandhi, plus many more. In true OFFF fashion the event was kicked off with the opening titles produced by the students at Atelier, an independent design school based in Barcelona. The students not only write, design, film and produce the opening titles but are also responsible for creating all the branding for the event from the t-shirts, fliers and welcome packs that the audience receive to the speaker stings and the teaser trailer posted shortly before OFFF festival begins. Teaser Trailer OFFF 2016 Opening Titles On the first day we enjoyed the company of Ustwo, who gave us an insight into their studio culture and discussed some of the projects that they had been working on both as client work but more interestingly the self initiated work. I found their internal motto really good, inspiring and pretty much a great way to approach new ides — JFDI (Just [email protected]/* */ Do It). Another highlight from day one was most certainly Paula Scher, who graced the stage with her many years of experience and also discussed some really interesting projects that covered not only design but moved more into social & cultural spaces. One example is the fantastic work Pentagram produced for the regeneration of Rockaway Beach. Using bold and customised typography Paula & the team at Pentagram managed to breathe a new life into the newly reopened beach boardwalk in Queens, New York. The second day had some excellent speakers on the agenda with the likes of Non-Format, a creative typographic duo based in the US & Norway, Hey Studio from Barcelona, Hiro Murai and many more. The biggest surprise talk was the team from Sid Lee, I had not heard of them before, however, when they took the stage I was totally engaged. The company ethos is similar to that of RoomCR6 with a clear focus on client work but also realising the importance of creative free time to work on side or self initiated projects. A great take away quote from their talk was, “What a group does with its billable time determines its income for a year. What it does with its non billable time determines its future.” We also heard from the guys at Unit 9 who gave us all a great overview of the work they have been exploring in the Virtual Reality sector. If you are interested in VR I would definitely suggest having a look at the work they produce, check out Storm — a virtual reality experience that combines puzzle solving with a sense of urgency to a new level of realism. It manages to evoke primal instincts. Signalise then took to the stage and carried the audience off on a nostalgic tour back into the 80s with his neon colours and retro pop culture illustrations. His talk took a very personal approach showing how he developed as a designer and illustrator from childhood with him ending on several points that seem to be a general theme at OFFF — Self initiated projects and sharing of your work. Day two was wrapped up with a very special performance by Joshua Davis, aka the godfather of OFFF, and former M.I.A drummer Kiran Gandhi. Joshua was on stage live coding and producing some stunning visuals whilst Kiran was ripping up the drum set and providing the OFFF audience with a grove that they couldn’t help but jump up and dance to. Half way through the set the audience pretty much stormed the stage and the conference turned into an impromptu party and gig! This has to be one of the most exciting things I have ever experience at a design event! Kudos to Joshua Davis & Kiran Gandhi! Day three started off a little quietly as I think most people were scattered around Barcelona nursing a hangover for the previous night’s events. We joined in a little later in the day to hear Johnny Cupcakes take us through the journey of setting up his extremely successful t-shirt business. Following Johnny Cupcakes we had Mr Bingo up on stage chatting about his project Hate Mail and his kickstarter campaign he set up to produce his coffee table book for the project. Mr Bingo took the audience through a few kickstarter campaign videos to prove a point in how dull and boring they generally are. With this in mind he wrote, recorded and filmed a parody rap video with the help of friends. We got ourselves cosy after the second break and watched the awesome talk from Golden Wolf who, once again, talked of the importance of self initiated projects and how their 8 second videos lead to paid client work. Last but by no means least we were treated to the OFFF festival tradition of the Main titles produced by one of our favourite UK based designers, the extremely energetic and enthusiastic Gavin Strange, aka JamFacotry, alongside with him onstage was Merlin Crossingham both from Aardman. The guys took the stage and unleashed 2016’s OFFF festival’s Main Titles, which blew the audience away! Here for your viewing pleasure are the titles! Enjoy As another OFFF festival drew to a close we left feeling inspired by all the incredible designers and creatives that took the stage. Not only did we enjoy our time in sunny Barcelona and meeting some cool fellow creatives but we have also left with lots of new ideas. One of the biggest points made by nearly all of those who took the stage this year year seemed to be the importance of creating passion projects and self initiated pieces of work. With that in mind we are back in London and ready to make this a creative summer! Thanks to all at OFFF festival and see you again next year.
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*GYBx7g8L0_HTGZ0rsOgzjg.jpeg

How To Pick Winning Product Features

$
0
0
I had a discussion with a group of product managers recently about differentiation and product strategy. We were reviewing my previous post, “How to Pitch Your Idea for Investment,” and we were discussing the concept of “winnable by us.” When you’re building a new product, it’s important to understand why this market opportunity is winnable by us. In other words, what do we have that’s a differentiator — either proprietary or first to market — that will allow us to effectively compete. In that post, I mentioned this about differentiators: The key with the proprietary differentiators or the first-to-market features are that they need to be valuable to customers. It’s no use for a company to have a bunch of proprietary differentiators, or to introduce first-to-market features, if the customers don’t care about them. In this post, I wanted to go deeper with the concept of differentiators, and discuss a framework that you can use to pick winning features for your product. A Framework for Picking Winning Features When considering possible product features, you should analyze the feature from two angles: (1) customer value, and (2) is it unique? Customer value: How important is the need that this feature would address for the customer? Is it high value (addresses a critical need), or low value (nice-to-have)? Will the feature address a scalable critical need across most customers, or is it a niche feature that only appeals to a small handful of customers? Is it unique?: Do any of the direct or indirect competitors in the market already provide this feature? If you include the feature in your product, would it be unique? Once you have analyzed the potential feature from these two angles, you can use the visual framework below to understand whether it’s a winning product feature. You always want to build products and features that are in the top half of the quadrant (high customer value). If you’re in the lower half of the quadrant, your product/design/eng resources can be better spent on other features. Table Stakes If something is of high customer value, but not unique in the market (meaning that most competitors already offer it), then it’s “Table Stakes”. These features are extremely important, and are the cost of doing business because customers value them and expect them. But they are not going to set you apart in any way. Differentiator As much as possible, you want to be in the upper right quadrant — high customer value and unique (meaning that most competitors don’t offer this today). Then you have found a true “Differentiator” that you should consider investing in from a strategic standpoint. Who Cares? The lower right quadrant is something that is unique in the market (most competitors don’t offer it today), but it’s also low customer value. This is a “Who Cares?” feature. To the point above, this is a trap that a PM (or a startup) can easily fall into — chasing products and features that are “differentiated” and unique in the market, but are not valued by customers. We always need to invest in differentiators that are high customer value and unique. Waste of Time The lower left quadrant is to be avoided as much as possible — low customer value and not scarce. These are “Waste of Time” features, and are probably the worst kind of features. Why? Because you’re tempted to chase these features in an effort to maintain competitive parity, but they don’t move the needle for customer value anyway. If you over-rely on sales or even customer input (without understanding the “why?” — is this feature really valuable to the customer?), then you’re likely to include at least some “Waste of Time” features. So what are the implications of this framework? You always want a mix of Table Stakes and Differentiators. Sometimes, when you’re entering a market where customers have existing expectations, it’s tempting to focus entirely on Table Stakes. If you’re only building Table Stakes features, everything you’ve built is also available with competitors (not unique), and there’s no compelling reason to buy your product — other than maybe price. So you will commoditize yourself if you’ve only build Table Stakes features. You will never be able to command a premium price, you will always be subject to intense competition. Not a winning strategy in the long-term. Can you turn a Table Stakes feature into a Differentiator? It’s ideal if you can pivot features that are considered Table Stakes into being somewhat of a Differentiator. It’s important to ask yourself every time you’re considering a Table Stakes feature: is there anything we can do to put our own twist on this to make it unique and valuable? iMac in 2001 Competitor monitors in 2001 As an example, when Apple introduced the iMac in 2001, computer monitors were considered Table Stakes. The Apple team asked themselves what they could do to take the Table Stakes feature — a gray, bland computer monitor — and make it unique? In doing so, they appealed to design-conscious consumers who appreciated the aesthetic and ability to personalize their computer monitor. They were able to take something that is high value to the customer (monitor) but at the time was a Table Stakes feature, and pivot it to make it unique and turn it into a Differentiator. And hence, they were able to compete the with multitude of commodity PC makers out there. Proprietary v. First-to-Market Differentiators A Differentiator can either be Proprietary or First-to-Market. The key difference between the two is whether the Differentiator is easy to replicate or not. What makes a Differentiator difficult to replicate (proprietary)? Some examples include: Valuable proprietary data Algorithms, trade secrets, patents Established brand The more Proprietary Differentiators that a company has, the harder it is for competitors to replicate, and the longer the company can operate in a market without facing direct competition. Having First to Market Differentiators are also valuable. As I wrote in “How to Pitch Your Idea for Investment”: This is the classic “first-mover” advantage, which can enable a company to build up an installed base of customers, build its brand and strategic position, and set the standards and expectations in a new market. This first-mover advantage can become especially powerful when there are high switching costs for customers, or when there are network effects to a business. But I would always choose Proprietary Differentiators over First to Market ones. The reason is that if you only have First to Market Differentiators, unless your execution is perfect and your competitors are asleep at the wheel, the competition can eventually catch up to you. As product managers and entrepreneurs, our job is to pick winning features for our product. In this post, I’ve provided a framework for doing just that. You start by analyzing the customer value v. uniqueness of the potential feature. Focus on high customer value features (upper two quadrants of the framework — a mix of Table Stakes and Differentiators). Avoid building only Table Stakes features, and think hard about whether you can convert a Table Stakes feature into a Differentiator. Avoid the classic startup trap of building Who Cares? features — differentiation for the sake of being different, but that are low value. And also don’t be swayed into chasing parity Waste of Time features just because they already exist with competitors, but are really low value. Finally, when considering a Differentiator, identify Proprietary ones over First-to-Market ones if at all possible. If you use these frameworks, I’m hopeful that you will be better able to pick winning product features.
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/600/1*b4YhgKlfB8_zz4c5URnpmw.jpeg

The Hardest Thing I Ever Had To Do And 20 Things Startup Founders Can Learn From It

$
0
0
“Sometimes it takes darkness and the sweet / confinement of your aloneness / to learn / anything or anyone / that does not bring you alive / is too small for you.” ~David Whyte “…I’m a magic fairy!!”“This is bad.” He had called me four times in a row not leaving a message. Each time, I had ignored the call because I hadn’t recognized the number. When the phone rang the fifth time, I remembered. Remembered the office number. Remembered his name. Remembered that he was a doctor. Remembered that a week ago he had punched a hole in my daughter's arm. Remembered the fear in her eyes when she saw the needle. Remembered thinking that she knew it was not going to be ok. Remembered the cool iPad app that he used during the exam. Remembered the way the mole that had grown too fast on her arm looked when it bled. Remembered he had said it would take a week. Remembered that it had been a week. Remembered the day job I felt was eating my soul. Remembered that I had good insurance through that job. Remembered the spelling words and word problems I had helped with the night before. Remembered the moment I knew my marriage was ending. Remembered the flight we were supposed to be taking in a few days. Remembered that this trip was supposed to save us. Remembered wondering when we would be able to admit we weren’t going to make it. Remembered the impossible to-do list running two startups and mentoring others had created. Remembered wondering how the fuck I had gotten myself here in my life. Remembered my favorite flavor of ice cream. Remembered the best run I had ever had. Remembered staring all night long at her perfect little button nose and rosebud mouth the night she was born. Remembered how she almost died three weeks after she was born. Remembered her running around in her fairy wings and ballet shoes when she was five screaming through her laughter, “You can’t catch me! I’m a magic fairy!” Remembered when we cut her hair for the first time. Remembered to answer the phone before it went to voicemail. Remembered to say, “Hello?”Remembered to say, “Thank you.” While the number is on the rise, as few as 1,000 kids a year are diagnosed with melanoma. Melanoma is an adult cancer, occurring most commonly in adults over the age of 55. And while some forms of pediatric melanoma have causes similar to adult melanoma (e.g., UV overexposure), spitzoid melanoma has no known cause. Data and statistics can vary, but since 1948 when it was first diagnosed, fatality rates in girls between the ages of 9–11 are grim, hovering between 51–85% mostly because they are caught too late. My daughter was 10, slathered in sunscreen from birth, and magic. There is no cure for melanoma. Treatment — if you can really call it that — is limited to surgery or, for some late stage cases in kids, one form of immunotherapy — Interferon alpha-2b. But here’s the deal: When cancer is caught in late stages, it’s too late. Treatments for late stage cancers are less about the children trying to live and more about the world using the last bits of their life to learn. Like my daughter, spitzoid melanoma isn’t easy to classify. Of the usual ABCDE observables or measurable elements used to identify early indications and warnings, only E — Evolution — comes close to providing clues some of the time. In eight months, what started out as a nanospeck of dark pigment barely even noticeable to the naked eye became a micro-mountain of rounded red flesh that would change our lives irrevocably. The day I told my daughter she had cancer was a hotter than hell blue sky day in the middle of July. I remember the color of the sky so vividly because most July days in Virginia the sky is an oppressive, opaque white. I had come home from work, changed my clothes, and made a dinner I couldn’t eat. I remember calling her back into the dining room after I had cleaned the kitchen. I remember sitting her in my lap and feeling flooded with grief that she didn’t fit like she had as a baby and wishing she were small again and I could hold her fully. That if only somehow I could rewind our life clock, I could fix it all, be a better mother, a better wife. I pressed my face to hers and could smell watermelon shampoo in her perfect hair and sweat at the nape of her neck. I remember her saying, “What’s wrong, mommy?” and knowing I had blown the first piece of advice: Try not to look upset or worried. I told her that her mole had been a cancerous tumor. That we had found the best doctors who were experts in this kind of cancer and who were going to help take care of her. That we would be going to meet them the next day and that she would have to have surgery soon after. She didn’t move. She didn’t blink. She didn’t cry. She just looked at me and asked, “Am I going to die? Am I going to lose my hair?” The hardest thing I have ever had to do was tell my daughter, “No. You are not going to die.” Not because I didn’t want to believe it. Not because I wasn’t willing to do everything and anything I had to do to prevent her from dying. But simply because the truth was she knew it might not be true and she knew that I was powerless and unable to make everything ok. Three years on, we are not the same people but what I learned was that in the midst of everything that breaks, becomes lost, and changes out from under you, you will find a clarity so lucid that only those that can hold their own with you will remain in your focus. During this same time, I held down a day job, co-founded a startup community, launched my own startup, hosted Startup Weekends, ran bootcamps, taught entrepreneurship classes at a local community college, co-created Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) for entrepreneurs, and mentored hundreds of startup founders, some of whom would go on to be more successful than me. In retrospect, all of that — all of the responsibility, the requirements, the obligations, the output — is probably what kept me from coming undone. A few months ago, I walked away from all of it, from most of my life as I had known it, built it, sold it. I was exhausted. My own startup had failed. I was tired of the incessant demands on my time that had no return for me and fed up with the noise of big ideas that weren’t that big. I wanted eight hours of sleep a night. I wanted to focus. I wanted to read a book again. I wanted to process the last three years of my life and recover. In these last few months I have spent a lot of time thinking about the strange and powerful clarity that came to me shortly after my daughter was diagnosed and how it enabled me to do what needed to be done, to see what others couldn’t and to focus within when there were too many unknowns around me. Being a startup founder is a precarious, lonely journey riddled with uncertainty, obscured by the fog of bad ideas, poor execution, and incessant noise, and a massive hit on your emotional and financial reserves. It is, ironically, more like discovering, fighting, and surviving cancer than winning the lottery. What follows are 20 lessons I learned after my daughter’s diagnosis that are as true for cancer as they are for being a startup founder. 1. You won’t see some signs until it’s almost too late. When you see them, it’s more important to act than to panic. I had noticed the little freckle on her upper arm when it first became visible because other than a mole on her neck that was exactly like the one on my stepson’s neck — even in the same spot — she had no freckles. I wrote it off as an inevitable part of the changes being brought on by the puberty that was inbound. Months later, when it had slight dimension, I asked her if it hurt, or was itchy, or bled. At worst, she said, it was annoying and nothing more. But I felt a twinge of unease anyway and then, a few weeks later she came to me and said, “Mom. Something’s not right”, and lifted her shirtsleeve to show what was now a mound twice as large, shedding, and slightly bloody. There are moments when you know you are in trouble and the impact of that trouble is exponentially higher than it would have been if you had seen and paid attention to the signs it was coming. This was one of those moments. Guilt, fear, doubt about my ability to be a good mother, and anger with myself for being focused on all the other things that I had going on hit me hard, fast, and below the belt. My worst fear was there, on my daughter’s arm in front of me. In moments like this there is only one choice to make — choose yourself, or choose the other person. If I had chosen myself, I would have allowed the terror of losing my daughter and the undeniable belief that it was my fault take control. Instead, I picked up the phone and started calling every dermatologist between DC and Charlottesville. When you make the decision to do the startup thing, you are stepping into a myriad of unknowns where the experience and expertise you have from other realms of your life won’t be enough. You are inherently outnumbered, outgunned, and outpaced by the enormity of the choices you will have to make. To say it is overwhelming is like pretending tsunamis can be surfed. There will be some actions you will take, decisions you will make, and goals you will achieve that will give you enough of a buoy to keep your chin above the water line but you cannot possibly imagine the sheer matrix of unknowns that will come at you. Your line of sight will be obscured by many things and one day you will see in front of you something capable of taking you out. Your first inclination will be to wonder how in the hell you missed it or to double down on self-flagellating for not having reacted sooner or to freak the fuck out because you know you are in some deep shit. But here’s the deal. In that moment when you see it, the best thing you can do is the opposite of what you feel, taking any action that will instead move you towards the problem because action is the enemy of powerlessness and it is the powerlessness — not the circumstances in front of you — that is fatal. 2. Timing is everything and you have no control over it. The dermatologist who did the first biopsy — the one who saved my daughter’s life — was young, unconventional, and deliberate. He used iPads, was working with a coder-friend to invent a better in-office diagnostic tool, didn’t treat anything as routine, and used his network to get the right answer. His approach to the daily tasks of his operation made the difference between life and death for my daughter because he caught an insanely aggressive, anomalous cancer in what appeared to be the early stages. How we ended up with him was equal parts the result of my own fuck up, time latencies I had no control over and luck. Sometimes, when you find out your child has cancer and the crush of fear folds your chest in on itself, you will be standing in a Wegman’s cafe full of people with kids like yours, listening to Dora the Explorer yelling at Swiper the Fox in the background with a couple of wannabe startup founders you just bought dinner for waiting for you to tell them things they will just end up ignoring. Sometimes, when people who have no idea what it means to be a mother because they are still kids themselves ask you if everything’s ok, you will tell them everything’s fine. Not because you don’t want to upset them or because your own kids are nearby but because you know it isn’t and you don’t feel like trying to explain things they couldn’t understand and then having to make them feel like it’s ok when they want to be sympathetic and sympathy isn’t enough. When you take the leap into Startupland, you will hear a lot of bullshit about timing. It will be held up as the Holy Grail, revered like a god, dissected like a good spy story, and used as a tool to pressure you to move at someone else’s speed. The reality is, timing is relative. You can no more bend time or optimize for it than you can change the weather by riding a bike. The truth is every action you take, every step you take — no matter whether it’s forwards, sideways, or backwards — influences the impact of timing on you and your startup. Not the other way around. It’s a numbers game and if you want to be on the upside of it, you need to increase your odds by taking as many actions and steps as you can, every day, no matter where you are, what you know, and what might happen next. Doing trumps timing every time. 3. You are going to fuck some things up. To learn, you have to get over it. It took me three months to get an appointment with that first dermatologist. From the minute I started calling, every office I called had a 4–6 month waiting list. I called every day, 10–12 places a day for three MONTHS and got nothing. On the last call I made, I begged a nurse on the phone to do anything she could to get us in and asked her, “If you were me and this was your daughter, what would you do?” She said, “You know, if you call your pediatrician and go see them first and they think something is wrong, any dermatologist will get you in that day.” I almost threw up in my mouth. How could I have been so stupid? How could I have fucked up something so obvious and so simple? What kind of mother was I? Why didn’t I ask that question when I made the first call three months ago? The honest answer is that I thought that I knew what I was doing. I had not called my pediatrician first because my pediatrician wasn’t a dermatologist and I wanted to skip that step and get straight to the right person. This one choice cost me three months of my daughter’s life. There aren’t enough priests in red velvet boxes around the world to take the guilt I still feel away. For a while, that guilt was a black hole in the center of my chest, crushing me. The first three days after her first dermatologist had called me to say it was cancer, I couldn’t look my daughter in the eye. I couldn’t look at myself in the mirror when I was brushing my teeth and I thought that I would die from the tightness in my chest. On the fourth day — the day I got clear about everything in my life — I knew that to make the best possible decisions for her I was going to have to forgive myself, get over what was done, and focus on what wasn’t and still needed to be. The early stages of a startup are like wading in an alligator infested swamp, late at night, drunk, with a couple of good buddies who are also drunk. It’s terrifyingly fun, exhausting, stupid, and sprinkled with moments of, “What the fuck was I thinking?!” Like parenting, you develop a certain innate sense of how and where to step that works for you and your drunk buddies right up until the moment it doesn’t. When that moment hits, it hits. And, make no mistake about it, the next one is lining up. You are going to fuck things up. You are going to delay when you should have moved out. You are going to turn away when you should have turned to. Some of your friends are going to leave you alone in the dark. A few people will get eaten by alligators or drown. If you spend the moments right after you are hit feeling stupid, cursing your arrogance, and berating yourself for not seeing it coming, you will create more delay, turn further away, and get more people killed again and again and again for the same fucking stupid reasons you did it the first time. Your primary responsibility as a startup founder is to learn from your mistakes and teach what you have learned to those who depend on you to lead so they won’t make them too. Your ability to learn is the only chance your startup has for surviving. Period. It’s called evolution. The first lesson startup founders need to learn and put into their daily practice is that growth requires letting go of everything you thought made you right. 4. You won’t always know what to say and you will still need to say it. Pediatric Oncology wasn’t managing my daughter’s case. They were consulting. She was a child with a grown up cancer so her case had been given to the melanoma specialists and oncologists who treated adults. As the pediatric oncologist who called me to let me know that this decision had been made said, “You’d be better off if she had leukemia because we know what to do with that.” I was terrified to tell my daughter she had cancer because saying it would make it real and I didn’t have any answers and I wasn’t sure how to keep my own fear in check so that it wouldn’t add to hers. The patient advocate I called for advice on how to say what had to be said was young, lovely, childless, and doing the best she could to help. The advice she gave made perfect sense and was easy to digest over the phone and utterly meaningless because what I really wanted was for her to tell me that my daughter didn’t have cancer. You are going to have to say and do hard things when you are the founder of a startup. You are going to have to kick out your co-founder, bounce straphangers, fire employees, tell your investors you’re belly up, tell customers you failed, or even walk away. There are no easy conversations when things are on the line and if you avoid having them, shit will blow up. Often, we avoid hard conversations because we are afraid of the uncertainty that lies on the other side of them and we presume that space is an alligator infested swamp. The best thing you can do is say hard things as soon as they need to be said, simply, truthfully, and without largesse. When you do this everyone can move more immediately into the space where action can be taken because they have information. Your job as a startup founder is to reduce uncertainty. The fastest way to do this is to test the waters by going in them yourself. You can’t be afraid of the consequences of things that have to be said. You need to be more afraid of the consequences of not saying them. 5. You will never only have to deal with one crisis at a time. I found out my daughter had cancer at 715PM on July 13th 2013. A few hours before that Bank of America officially notified me that the short sale on my house I had been fighting with them for 12 months to get approved was finally approved. Months before that, my pay had been cut by 20% at the same time my stepson, who was battling a horrific heroin addiction, was arrested and imprisoned and the money we had spent trying to get him help — rehab, legal, etc., — had devastated our savings. At the same time, my marriage was ending and my parents and brother and I had had a massive falling out a few months earlier, In addition to losing my ass, my entire support network had disappeared. Everything in my life was blowing up all at the same time. In hindsight, the 12 month ordeal that Bank of America put me through gave me a new, daily practice in discomfort. I am, by nature, high energy, intense, and driven to make things happen, to build things, to move things, to change things. It’s a hardwired compulsion which — once I stopped trying to fight it — became a power tool. This compulsion is also my medicine, the antidote to stress, to fear, to boredom. And this tool was utterly useless in my fight against Bank of America. I was a David without a stone in a cage fight with Goliath. After three months of going hard at the problem I realized I was fighting something much bigger than me and that the real power puncher in the fight was someone I would never know or see, obscured by layers of hired guns. One night, after a call that ended badly for the Bank of America rep on the other end, I remembered an incident that had happened shortly after I had quit college, moved home, and experienced a bad breakup. A few of my childhood friends — all guys — had heard about my breakup and in true bromance form had been trying to get me out of my sadness and into the nearest bar where we could pound beer, tell raunchy jokes, and dance until the sun came up. These guys were my best friends and they were the last people I wanted to see until one night they showed up at my house and literally pulled me out of the door. Hours later, after we were kicked out of the last bar left open in our small town, we scurried down the backyard hill of some stranger's house, ditched our clothes, and jumped into the river. It was a hot night, the water was silky and cool and we were snorting with laughter right up until that moment we realized we were being pulled downriver and going under. Luckily, we were too drunk to panic and, like drunk buddies do, started laughing about the fact that we were drowning. At one point as I was moving downstream I looked to my left and saw a sapling sticking sideways out of the riverbank and shouted out, “Hey fellas, it’s Hands Across America Time!” and grabbed the sapling. One by one we created a human chain and I reeled us in to the bank where we shimmied up to the top and ran, naked and covered in river mud, a couple of blocks back to the house where our clothes were. What was in my mind now, after hanging up with Bank of America, was the understanding that I needed to get still. To not panic, or hide, avoid, bemoan, or fight my discomfort but instead just quietly acknowledge it and let it be there with me. When new and jarring developments would occur with the bank — or my stepson, or in my marriage, or at the job I had at the time — I would do the same thing, and eventually, stillness became another power tool. I learned that things are morbidly uncomfortable right up until the moment they aren’t. How long discomfort lasts is directly proportional to how much you try to make it stop, go away, feel better than it does, or act like it’s not there. By the time my daughter was diagnosed with cancer, I had two well developed tools to get me through the crisis phase and navigate our new normal. If you think for one minute that you will get the startup dream without the startup nightmare, you’re not qualified to be a startup founder. If you think for one minute that most days there won’t be three or four serious things blowing up around you that are YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to deal with, you need to fire yourself and go rent some movies. The reality for startup founders is that most days you are facing sucking chest wounds, are understaffed, out of supplies, and have more casualties on the way. The best thing you can do for yourself and your team is to not make it worse by freaking out, hoping they will go away, or pretending that sucking chest wounds aren’t fatal. If you want to make it, you need to cultivate mindfulness and stillness. Follow the ABCs — stay aware, be where you are and control what is right in front of you and yours to own. Becoming good at knowing what you can and can’t do and getting good at bending without breaking or falling over is a critical startup founder skillset. 6. Your job isn’t to make people feel better. Your job is to do your fucking job. When my daughter was diagnosed, I felt obliterated. I wished that it was me that had been diagnosed, not her. I wished that they had made a mistake. I started hoping that maybe they were wrong and I felt out of my element, uncomfortable with letting strangers with more knowledge than me take command of my daughter’s life. Within the first few days of her diagnosis I was scheduling closing times for the house, working through the final stacks of paper for the banks, negotiating with bank negotiators, agents, and buyers, postponing flights and reservations, consulting and arguing with insurance companies, researching spitzoid melanoma, scheduling consultations with oncologists, talking to pediatric oncology patient advocates and dermatopathologists, looking for a rental, reserving moving trucks, packing up my life, going to work, making dinner, checking homework, feeding the dog, reading bedtime stories and all of the other normal tasks that had been part of my everyday life. In the midst of this, all I really wanted to do was go to sleep and wake up with a superpower or a miracle that would make things better for my daughter but I couldn’t. I couldn’t make her cancer go away. I couldn’t invent a cure. I couldn’t guarantee her that everything would be ok. In hindsight, I was so very lucky to have had so many things to do that I didn’t have time to stop and think about any of it because if I had even for one moment paused I am certain I would have broken and been unable to do what needed to be done. When you are a startup founder, bad things are going to happen to you that make you so afraid you will feel violently ill. They will happen at the worst possible time and they may very well be things you can’t overcome. You will feel alone, vulnerable, and at the mercy of something more powerful than you, totally out of your league, and you will have partners, investors, friends, spouses, advisors, and employees who will look to you to make everything ok. And make no mistake about it, that thing you are at the mercy of IS far more powerful than you. If you spend one second of your time trying to make any of these people feel better or trying to make things ok, your startup will go under. Your job is to make the phone calls, learn what you can as fast as you can, negotiate, find reinforcements, make the numbers work, establish new partnerships, unload what you don’t need (including people), streamline operations, and make sure other people are doing their jobs. You cannot be slowed down or distracted by trying to make things ok because ok is subjective and its qualitative nature will burden you with a set of expectations you will never be able to meet. Your only focus needs to be on getting what needs to be done, done. Do your fucking job. Every day. And if you have to, do more. Nature hates a vacuum and the land of OK is devoid of oxygen and where startups go to die. 7. The person with the least power will try to own you. Master one shot, one kill. Everything about my daughter’s cancer was rare and because of this the dermatopathology lab in Philadelphia decided to have her biopsy reviewed by an expert who ran another lab in Boston and so sent her biopsy there. I had already begun coordinating with her team of specialists who were in Baltimore and needed her biopsy sample so that they could have their own dermatopathologists review it prior to surgery. What should have been a minor procedural change became one of the worst cases of cock-blocking I have ever encountered. My daughter’s specialists had contacted the lab in Boston to have the sample express shipped to them. The doctor who ran the lab in Boston was on vacation for two weeks and the office manager at the lab was refusing to release the sample despite the fact that the other lab, the original dermatologist, and now her specialists had all officially requested that she do so. The oncologist called me to let me know that they were going to have to delay my daughter’s surgery unless they could get the sample within the next 24 hours and they didn’t want to delay her surgery because they were alarmed by the characteristics of her tumor. I asked them for the number of the lab and called the office manager myself. I told her who I was, what I needed her to do, and why. “I don’t know who you think you are”, she said, “and I don’t know how you got my direct number but let me very clear with you: you have no authority here. This is a chain of custody issue and I will not release this sample until doctor returns from vacation. I seriously doubt two weeks will make that much of a difference.” The world is filled with people who suck and when given enough of a taste of power they will wield it like a broadsword every chance they get. Usually, my first inclination with people like this is to disarm them. I treat interacting with them the way hostage negotiators talk hostage takers out of the building. Throwing their back up against the wall will nine times out of ten guarantee you a failed outcome. So, I explained my situation one more time and then asked the woman on the phone, “If it was your daughter who needed this biopsy sent to another facility so that they could save her life, what would you want your lab to do?” She said, “Your problems don’t change our policy.” So I said, “I am going to give you one of two options. You can get the doctor who is in charge while your boss is on vacation the paperwork that needs to be signed to release and ship the biopsy sample or I am going to get a court order instructing you to hand that biopsy over and if that is the route I have to take, your boss can explain to every major TV network why I had to do that.” She replied, “Listen, you don’t understand. This is about chain of custody.” to which I said, “No. You don’t understand. I brought that hunk of my kid’s arm into this world. Chain of custody starts and stops with me. This conversation is over because you are now wasting my time.” And I hung up the phone. The truth is, I had no fucking idea how the hell I would get a Boston court to issue a court order five hours before courts closed. But she didn’t know that and I was more than ready and willing to drive to Boston that night so that I could be in a courthouse at 8AM the next morning and figure that shit out if I had to. The thing is, these types of people also extract a false sense of power by controlling your time and the quickest way to find out if that’s the kind of person you are dealing with is to take back control of your time from them. Five minutes later the phone rang. It was the doctor who was temporarily in charge of that lab calling to tell me the release paperwork was complete and the sample was awaiting pick up for overnight shipping to her oncologist. He had his office manager call with the tracking number an hour later. Every startup founder I have ever mentored has what I call the “$10,000 man”. This is a guy who through a couple of standard mechanisms — joined your team at a hackathon, heard about your startup and wants to “help”, got connected to you through a family friend — wants to give you $10,000 in cash and in exchange wants to be the CEO, own 80% of the company, and call all of the shots from the phone in the cushy office at his day job. He thinks you are so fucking desperate for cash that you will agree that his money is worth more than it is. This guy is invariably older than you, experienced in a totally different vertical, and thinks because he has a 401(k) he’s an investor. This guy is a jackwagon who knows nothing but thinks his money entitles him to own your ass. Every startup founder I have ever mentored also has to deal with a whole slew of other types of people who are the gatekeepers to the exclusive event, the investor, opportunity, candidate, or customer that is needed to get momentum, exposure, or help. Being a startup founder is a lot like being road kill that’s not quite dead. The minute you are outed as “trying to launch a startup” you are at a disadvantage. Predators like the $10,000 man smell your fear and know that you are too stupid to understand that the last thing you should be doing is taking anyone’s money. The gatekeepers will believe you have no power, no authority, and are as useful to them as the walking dead. The most important people skill startup founders should cultivate is what I like to call one shot, one kill. Give everyone one shot at explaining how they are going to help you ($10K guy), or why they can’t or won’t do what you need or want or asked. If their answer doesn’t meet your needs — and you have done due diligence on your need — kill the interaction. Say no, hang up the phone, or walk away and spend your resources and time getting to the person who can help you get to the next step. The early stages of a startup are crucial to establishing good habits. Wasting time with people who don’t matter is like burning money because time is your most important currency. 8. Common sense is more important than protocol but if you don’t understand the protocol you won’t be able to exploit it. After our initial consultation with the surgical oncologist, my daughter’s surgery was scheduled. She would be having a procedure called a wide local excision. This procedure starts at the site of the original tumor and then goes in a wide radius around the site so that oncologists can examine tissue beyond the margins of the original biopsy to see if any of the cancerous cells have spread. If they can’t find it in the margins, you are warned that it’s not a guarantee that it hasn’t and you are informed that the margin of error can be high in some cases. If it has, this procedure is then typically followed up with a sentinel lymph node biopsy. Sentinel lymph nodes are like gateways. If cancer is found in them, it’s a good sign that it has spread to other parts of your body. A few days after her surgery was scheduled, I was driving to a meeting and I found myself wondering why both surgeries couldn’t be done at the same time. It seemed to me that if the objective was to know if and where this cancer had spread why wouldn’t we just knock both surgeries out at the same time and get the most possible data we could to make the right decisions. I called the oncologist and left a voicemail asking her the same thing. She called me later as I was on the way home, explaining that it wasn’t protocol to do both surgeries at the same time. The protocol concern seemed misplaced to me. Here we were dealing with a cancer that is rarely ever seen and is more aggressive in children than in adults and that, to my knowledge, didn’t follow any established protocol. And while the oncologist explained that standard medical protocol with surgery was to only do those surgeries that were necessary, it seemed to me that we had a good case of necessary. At one point I asked her if her if she was unwilling to do both surgeries at the same time for ethical reasons or just primarily because of standard medical protocol. I needed to understand the root of her resistance because I wasn’t going to waste time trying to convince her if it was either or both. I would instead spend that energy finding an oncologist who saw value in getting as much information as possible in one shot. Her reluctance was tied to her desire to follow standard protocol but when pressed, she agreed to do both surgeries and both results came back clean, giving the strongest data indication that we had caught my daughter’s cancer early. When you are a startup founder, holding onto protocol is one of the quickest ways to get eaten alive. There is no protocol in Startupland. People believe a whole myriad of myths and accept a whole lot of anecdotal evidence as proof of what should be done, when it should be done, and how it should be done. The dirty secret is the most important thing you can do also happens to be what makes the most sense to you even if it’s not how things normally get done because you have more situational awareness of the parts of your startup that matter. Don’t waste a lot of time explaining what you want done to people who have already made up their minds about how you ought to do it. You are broke, in a desperate situation, and have few resources to marshall. If it makes sense to you, be clear about why and be clear that it does makes sense. Plenty of half-baked founders insist that what they are doing makes sense when in fact it does not. If you can’t show a tangible, measurable benefit to the action you are considering and the outcome you are going for, it doesn’t make sense. If you have to deal with protocols, regulations, or rules, don’t ignore them. Study them, find their weakness, and exploit them. Know your target, aim, and shoot straight. 9. To keep your shit together, you need to fall apart. For the first three days after my daughter was diagnosed, I was a hot mess. I did everything I was supposed to do and held it together at the office, in the kitchen at home, dropping the kids off at school. I cried in moments that I was alone and choked on my own fear anytime I tried to eat or drink or brush my teeth but by day three I knew if I didn’t get my shit straight I wasn’t going to be able to make the decisions that needed to be made. So I sucked it up, tucked it away, and got to work. One month after her surgery, her diagnosis confirmed, and her prognosis hopeful but completely uncertain, I was at my desk at work and noticed a notification from Google about a new “Story” on my Goolge+ profile. When I clicked on the notification it showed two videos with my daughter in them taken in July. I opened them and watched as she moved the phone camera from the left side of her head then slowly to the right, then along the top, then down the length of her ponytail. The first one was silent. The second, slightly longer, ended with this: “Mommy. I hope you don’t get mad but I just wanted to take a video of my hair so that if I lose it, I can remember what it looked like. Remember what I looked like with it. Love you, Mommy.” She had taken them in the examining room during the first visit with her oncologist when we would find out the full extent of what we were dealing with. She had been sitting on the table while the oncologist and her team of residents talked to me about how interesting her case was and what would be coming next when she took these and none of us had noticed. When the second video ended, I left my desk, drove to a nearby park and cried until I ran out of tears, my face was numb, and my lungs felt raw. At one point, I am certain, the sounds coming out of me sounded more like a howl than a human cry. By the time I was done, I had been there for 5 hours but it had felt like seconds. I felt heavy, like I was treading water in the deep end of the pool with jeans, boots, and a flannel shirt on. I don’t remember driving home. I don’t remember making dinner. I don’t remember going to bed. But when I woke up, I remember knowing that everything had permanently changed in my life. It was undeniable, clear, and right in front of me. There was no going back. Startupland loves its myths, its movie-worthy hero’s journey, and its holy lands. In all of these, the struggle is depicted as something manageable, a mere, necessary blip of emotion before the view fades to black and it’s gone. Here’s the thing: The pressures in Startupland on a founder are inhumane and unbearable. You are not built to carry them alone, much less all the time or well and you will have to carry most of them alone anyway, most of the time. If you do not allow yourself to break occasionally under the strain — to feel your sorrow, your upset, your fear — you will not learn how to bend. The untold story of Startupland, the one that never makes it to the Big Screen or scores a book deal or gets told over and over again at every startup event between Palo Alto and Mumbai is the one of depression, despair, and death. Startup founders are innately different from other people so they start out life at a disadvantage for support, inclusion, and solace. The very thing that makes them the right fit for doing what others won’t isolates them from almost everyone and that isolation twists them into thinking that when things become too much it’s their fault. The guilt and shame of feeling inadequate renders them hidebound to the myth of the hero’s journey. Some of the world’s brightest founders — people who were putting that proverbial dent in the universe — have killed themselves because by the time they were no longer able to deny their pain all they wanted to do was be free of it. There will be a day when the only way to get through the pain, stress, and upset roiling through you is to find a place and break, coming apart completely into little bits. It’s the most important journey you can take because falling apart allows the toxic pressures to come out and they will blow apart the bullshit that doesn’t actually matter, break the things that aren’t strong enough to sustain, and render to dust the things that you were holding tightly to that were blinding you, holding you back, or killing you. Falling apart allows you to rebuild with a stronger foundation because you get to choose from the rubble only those things that add value when you put yourself back together and your definition of value will be more clear because what want wasn’t working will be gone. If you don’t fall apart, your foundation will become obliterated under the weight of things that don’t actually matter or add to your mission, your vision, or your life. Falling apart is what makes you human and you cannot sacrifice your humanity for someone else’s mythology. 10. You won’t always know what to do and it will be imperative that you find a focus. What I remember most about the first three days after my daughter’s diagnosis was that I was only able to look at her face when she was sleeping. I was afraid to go to sleep, afraid to stop looking at her, afraid that if I did, when I awoke, she would be gone. I was exhausted, overwhelmed by the enormity of what I didn’t know, and uncertain of what the experts knew because there were so many anomalies in her tumor. I kissed her and hugged her and made idle chatter, reviewed her homework, made her dinner, brushed her hair, told her she was beautiful, and couldn’t look her in the eye. I couldn’t let her see my fear or bear to see my own failure reflected in her blue and gold eyes because I didn’t know if I could save her. My fear was growing larger than my own life, creating an opacity in my thinking, and making it hard for me to function. I was on the verge of shutting down and knew I couldn’t but wasn’t sure I could stop it from happening. I didn’t know what to do. So, I did the only thing that made sense — I defined the problem in one sentence and wrote it down. My one sentence problem was this: I don’t want my daughter to die and I don’t have the information or resources I need to know how to keep her alive. Like we learn in first grade when they teach us the scientific method, I needed to frame the problem so that I could focus on something tangible. I had to read the words on the page to create something I could see and focus on so that I could figure out quickly what I had to do next and and then do it. I found historical medical archives documenting some of the first cases discovered in girls my daughter’s age. I read descriptions of their tumors. I read about the earliest doctor to discover it in children. I researched my daughter’s specialists to see what they knew, what research they had published, and who else had cited their work. I researched experimental treatments and genomic expressions and prevailing theories on the root causes of melanoma. I created a spreadsheet of information, people, tumor characteristics, outcomes, theories, phone calls. I referenced, cross-referenced, made cold calls, and analyzed everything I could find. If I had stayed focused on my goal to make her cancer go away — to make everything ok — I would have gone under, pulling her with me. If I could give startup founders one gift from this experience, it would be this: Fear is not tangible. It is made up shit. Your job isn’t to be fearless. Your job is to reframe fear as something you need to understand better. Maybe what you need to understand is external to you — a market segment, a competitor, a legal issue, a rare cancer. Maybe it’s within — an emotional trigger, unresolved issue, or inability to adapt. Whatever the case may be, it is your moral imperative as a leader to get to the real issue driving your fear immediately, put it in your sights and get to work. If you can’t, you will fail because you will be focused on things that you can’t impact, that others can’t see and that no one but you will have clear sight of. 11. Do your research. Writing down my one problem sentence gave me a slew of self-imposed tasks designed to make me smarter faster about what I was dealing with. I felt like a Commander preparing for battle and I was ruthless in getting everything and everyone I needed marshalled to my plan. When I went into to meet with oncologists and specialists and pathologists I had data, case studies, evidence, and a virtual library of information I had assembled. I knew about the unique characteristics of some of the tumors founds in the prepubescent patients first discovered by Sophie Spitz in 1948. I had a list of questions and an expectation of the type of answer I was looking for. I needed to measure not only my own assumptions but the willingness of her team to provide answers and — more importantly — look for them if they had not thought to answer that question before. The research I did gave me good reason to worry that we were in some deep shit but it also gave me the language, the methods, and the tactics used by the leading specialists in the field so that I could communicate with them. More importantly, it showed me that these highly qualified people tended to look at this problem in children through a rather stale scientific lens. Very little information about genomics was present in this research. No research that I read had sought to find a correlation between estrogen and increased lethality. None of the research established patterns or histories of other cancers in the family genetics that might provide clues to the root causes of this cancer in kids. This information gave me the power to make the best possible decisions for my daughter and — when required — to force the team of specialists to go outside their comfort zone, to stop hiding behind protocol, and to do something they hadn’t done before because I could provide specific targets for them to shoot for that had a return for them and for my daughter. My goal was to take what I was good at — thinking differently, data analysis, problem solving — and use it to drive this team’s approach to treating my daughter. She was more different than any patient with melanoma that they had ever treated and my job as her mother was to make sure they understood that the normal playbook wouldn’t be allowed. To do this effectively, I would have to understand what made them interested enough to deviate from it. The number one sign that a startup founder isn’t worth my time is the answer to this question:”Who is your customer?”. Take note: if you believe your customers are soccer moms, old people who don’t like to buy cars, health nuts who want better food, millennials, people with older cars that don’t have bluetooth and want to stream music, people with gluten intolerance, college kids with mobile phones, or people who want to improve their finances, you are not alone. I can’t tell you the number of times I have gotten these answers from people or how they then struggle to understand why these answers are a sure sign that their big idea is not so big. If you can’t be specific about your market, you can’t be specific about the problem you are solving. Unless you can create a machine that simultaneously puts a soccer mom in four places at the same time, has a well-balanced hot dinner on the table when everyone comes home from work/school/the soccer field/dance, checks homework, gets through bathtime, bedtime, and all the dirty laundry at the same time, packs the next day's lunch, keeps her body smoking hot for her aging husband, and checks in with her elderly parents to make sure they took their meds, you are probably not going to build anything that she gives two shits about because she is infinitely more complex than a census demographic. In the age of online repositories of business news, government data, and social platforms there is no excuse for not understanding a few very specific problems and the specific people who have them. To actually understand if your research was good enough, you will also have to go offline and into the real world of living humans, putting yourself, your idea, and your assumptions out there to be validated or rejected. And you will have to do this over and over again until you get it right. Your challenge is to avoid confirmation bias. Most startup founders are so in need of being right that they are unwilling to get it right. If startup founders do research they often look for data that reinforces their belief that they are on to something big. They will present confirming evidence that their idea is shithot and it will sound a lot like this: “Big Company XXX is doing it and has 500 million people using their app but ours will be better because of ” or “Nobody else is doing it. I searched Google and nothing came up”. This research is at best, comical and a self serving attempt at validation. Your job when you are researching is, simply, to target a tribe and quickly become an expert on the ONE problem that is fucking up the daily existence of one set of people within that tribe. Google isn’t enough but it’s a start. To get research that matters, you need to go to your tribe. If you are only doing your research online, you haven’t found your tribe or a problem that matters. 12. To succeed, you have to know how to deal with yourself. It’s been almost three years since that first phone call. In the time between then and now everything we had known to be true, that had defined who we were and how we lived, ended. We lost our home, my marriage crumbled, one startup failed and I walked away from all the other startup stuff I was doing. I changed day jobs, the kids changed schools, we moved and then moved again. Doctor’s visits still never feel routine and too often yield surprises. Cancer ushered in a new normal and this cancer — with its relative obscurity and unpredictable life cycle and insidious assault on what I cherished more than my own life — is here to stay. In the weeks and months that followed her diagnosis, my daughter would have four tumors and her sentinel lymph nodes removed and begin regular visits with specialists. Sometimes, a routine checkup became a mini-surgery with scalpels, needles, and stitches. Sometimes, the tumors were benign. Sometimes we found them ourselves. Sometimes they were hidden in her perfect hair. Sometimes they were small, like a piece of dirt, barely noticeable until they were excised, their tentacled, bloody ganglia dangling from the doctor’s fingers. The difference between who I am now and who I was three years ago comes down to one thing and one thing alone: asking the right question. One night, I came home to a house with no family in it. Just me and the dog and a new arrangement between my husband and I that was the result of financial strain and emotional weariness. It overwhelmed me and I found myself in a heap, wondering how the hell this had all happened and why it had happened. These two questions just kept tumbling around and around me and the longer they did the more despairing I felt. And then a strange thing happened: This question came to me: “What were you getting out of it?” And all of a sudden I realized that the answer for what had happened to my life — the only answer that would matter — was the answer to that question and that answer was somewhere within me. Answering that question became my most important mission. If I wanted to be the person I was capable of being and live the life that felt authentic and was important to me, I had to understand what my deep and dark drivers were. Answering that question was hard. I had to get real and honest about some seriously fucked up shit in my head. But as I did it created space for something new — clarity. When my daughter’s cancer struck it triggered an anxiety and a fear more powerful than anything I had ever experienced. In front of me was my worst fear — one or both of my children dying. It threw me into a world where I didn’t know the language, would have to rely on strangers, and had no control at a time when the foundations of my life were collapsing around me. Instead of seeing the destruction, I chose to see the opportunity. All around me were clear signs that how I had been operating in my life wasn’t working so instead of trying to save it I decided to use this clarity to my advantage and I let that shit go. My daughter’s diagnosis taught me the difference between a real problem and a made up problem. It taught me that most of us are running around full of resentment and anger and angst due to the failure of the fantasies in our head which we have convinced ourselves we deserve to magically materialize. In the workplace this looks a lot talking shit about a coworker that has the job you think you should have or throwing a tantrum when you aren’t getting your way, or refusing to adapt to changes that are good for the rest of the team because you won’t feel you are as important/have as much control/have top cover, or maintain your status. In a marriage this looks a lot like giving attention to anyone that you think is better looking, more interesting, has a sexy accent, is obviously more loving and would definitely be a better fit for you than the person who has been by your side for decades despite the terrible shit you might have put them through. Inside your car this looks a lot like screaming at the person who cut you off because you know they did it on purpose. Inside your head this looks a lot going through the course of everyday reacting to everything as though the world around you is filled with problems. The truth is the problems around you are mostly made up shit. The harsh truth is most of the shit is of your own making — the broken fragments of delusional fantasies forged together by childish entitlement and an insatiable desire to be right without having to do the work to get it right. Real problems are not of your own making, are rarely if ever under your span of control, are few in their numbers and are immense in their uncertainty. Made up shit is always a choice. If you don’t work hard to understand how you move through your day and why when a real problem happens you won’t have the clarity you need to deal with it and most of what you care about will be lost. The sooner startup founders understand that uncertainty is is always going to be bigger, more powerful, and more present than they are, the sooner they can harness it. To harness it, you have to know the root of your compulsions and you have to fundamentally understand their influence on your behavior and decisions. If you don’t, your actions and your intentions will never be aligned and you will make catastrophic decisions and never understand why. This will doom you and your startup because when you can’t see yourself any vision you have is impaired. Your job as a founder is to stay clear. If you need a therapist, priest, monk, coach, or shaman to help you get one. 13. People you love, trust, and care about most will disappoint you. You must forgive them. When my daughter’s diagnosis was confirmed, my husband was in Colorado visiting friends. He had driven out in advance of me in the kids who were going to fly and meet him and then road trip through Colorado and Arizona to see the Grand Canyon, the Rockies, and if we could save our marriage. When I first called him, I was distraught. He said, “Do you think I need to come back? Don’t you think you could wait until after our vacation to schedule the surgery?” Not long after my marriage broke up I called one of my best friends. I needed to talk to someone who loved me, who knew me, who had known us, and who would be a voice in the darkness. I left voicemail after voicemail. Months later, when she called to say she would be in town if I wanted to swing by and see her, I asked her why she had never returned my calls. “I didn’t want to deal with it”, she said. A year after my daughter’s diagnosis, a friend I had partnered up with on one of my startups went offline right before a milestone release. Phone calls, emails, and texts which had occurred with predictable regularity every day suddenly stopped. When I finally made contact, the whole thing exploded and we parted ways never to be friends again. Later I would find out that — unbeknownst to me and another person he was in business with — he had joined another startup and had dropped all work on ours. During my daughter’s recovery and as I tried to put our lives back together I thought about these moments that had brought with them great disappointment, incensed anger, a sense of deep betrayal, and a feeling of isolation that was vast and brutal. In those moments, I didn’t have the energy to hold onto anger or sadness. For a while it was all I could do to show up in my life, But at the same time there were these little moments of peace and joy brought on by the most simple of things that would carry me through. Sometimes, it was the slant of sunlight on the kitchen wall or the smell of fresh cut grass or the sound of my kids breathing in deep, restful sleep at night. Noticing them became a daily practice, one that taught me the power of gratitude and the strength that comes with making peace with this one life we have. I learned that allowing others to find the path they have to take frees you to find your own. When you are a startup founder you are going to lose a lot. You are going to lose time, friends, money, partners, and motivation. People you trust will betray you. People you love will leave. People you depend on will let you down. People who believed in you will stop believing in you. In the midst of all of this you will feel disconnected, adrift, and afraid and it will be critically important that you don’t give into anger. Your job as a startup founder is to figure out how to recover quickly from loss, disappointment, failure, and disaster. Recovering quickly doesn’t mean suppressing or denying your emotions. It means that you set a target on the other side of them and then do the work it takes to get there. It means accepting the limitations of others not as reflections of what they are lacking but has indicators of where they are in their own journey and committing not to stall your own by focusing on theirs. It requires daily gratitude for the little things that you don’t have control over that make life beautiful. 14. To get it right, your vision has to be bigger than everybody elses. My meetings with my daughter’s specialists were less about passively receiving their findings, their opinions, or their recommendations and more about making sure we were executing this mission as a team, maintaining situational awareness across all stakeholders, and constantly looking for the opportunity space. Sometimes, this created friction. In one instance I wanted pathology to genomically type her tumors. Their initial response was that it wouldn’t make a difference and they were reluctant to do it and so I didn’t stop until they did because in my view of the problem knowing the specific genomic expressions in this tumor not only allowed us to compare subsequent tumors in her — or god forbid my son if it occurred in him — but more importantly, it gave us the unique signature of her cancer. I realized early on that nobody — not even these amazing doctors — had the vision of my daughter’s future that I did and that if I wanted her to have a chance in hell of realizing some version of it I had to make them see it so clearly they wanted it to. My vision of my daughter’s future had all of the normal desires a mother imposes on her children once she knows they are coming — health, education, love, adventure, financial security, happiness, friends, and family. And then I added a new one: bioengineered cure for her cancer. I believe that if the age of information has one singular advantage over every other it is this: the Human Genome Project. Most of how we have prosecuted medical breakthroughs has been through research on diseases at scale and looking to find patterns within them across populations at scale. Much like a startup, medical advances are looking for a way to generalize specific problems to a large group of seemingly similar people. What the Human Genome project provides for medicine is the possibility that, with enough information about our own body and services that can model and map genomic expression, we have the information we need to custom engineer treatments and cures for individuals. My daughter’s specialists are trained to do one thing exceptionally well — react to cancer. I needed them to change that paradigm and be willing to imagine a not so far off future where the genomic data they could collect might help her own body cure her. I needed to give them an opportunity to participate in something bigger than what was in front of them, under their scalpels, or in their files. Startup founders have to be able to see what others can’t. They have to have a vision so big that it’s very size creates a dark matter powerful enough to carry others along with it. They have to be the sun in the systems of people, places, and things they are moving with every day. If they are anything less than that no one will follow. It is an enormous burden. It is an enormous opportunity. When there is nothing external to find faith in, you, the Founder, must have faith in the vision. 15. You will never be comfortable. My daughter’s cancer is an aggressive, sneaky bastard. The standard protocol for the parents of patients diagnosed with it is to wait and watch. The obvious indicators that it’s back are moles that come up suddenly or moles that change. The sneaky signs that it’s come back somewhere inside of you — like your eye, your brain, your liver, your spine — are things that at any given point in a busy pubescent kid’s life would not necessarily raise concern — fatigue, headaches, mood changes. Doctors will use CT scans or MRIs only if there seems to be a “good reason” to look. Usually, by the time the reason is good enough to warrant them looking (and the insurance companies paying for it), it’s too fucking late. Sometimes, we can go for months doing skin checks with nothing to report. Other times it’s a rapid fire sequence of events, indications and warnings. There is no such thing as a routine visit to the doctor anymore, even for a sinus infection. The process of going over your kid’s skin regularly and then teaching them to do it is mundane and tedious and because of this the risk of complacency is high. At the same time, staying on high alert is not sustainable and it will get you to complacency faster than the tedium. We live in constant discomfort. We do not have the luxury of getting comfortable with the mundane or accepting that anything is ordinary. To master this discomfort, I add to it by doing continuous research, by never allowing myself to assume that anything is common and by continuously disrupting the preferred strategy most commonly employed for dealing with her disease. Instead of fighting the discomfort, I have consciously chosen to harness it, to use it as a force multiplier for moving my knowledge and her team forward towards a better outcome. If this means I have to change her team, so be it. When you are a startup founder the hardest thing to do is fight your own desire to be comfortable, to feel that everything is going to be ok and to get to a point where you feel less stressed and concerned. Even though this is a basic human compulsion, the problem with following this drive is that it leads you away from your success. Following it means you choose willful ignorance to avoid hard truths which might contain the information you need to have a breakthrough, make a change in staffing or refactor key partnerships or resources. Following it means that you will only consider evidenced-based data that shows you the good story you want to believe. Following it means that you do anything that keeps you feeling comfortable and this will get you completely disrupted by someone else who isn’t. If you want examples of how dangerous comfort is as a way of conducting business, look at some of the most storied and impactful companies the US has ever produced. They had achieved market domination, marginalized or eliminated competition, and built a business model that had a long, sustainable tail. IBM, Standard Oil, American Steel, Kodak, and Xerox forged new markets, changed the face of modern American business, and then hit their stride. These companies enjoyed decades of success and when faced with market disruptions (or disruptors), instead of rethinking how they were doing business, adapting their long standing strategies and going outside of their institutionalized norms, they decided that their size and momentum was proof that their model for business was right. Of those five companies, only IBM managed to survive its own arrogance and then only after a loss of billions of dollars, several CEOs, a decimated global workforce, an epic slide in market share and market value, and the rise of more agile, hungry competitors all around them who were there to stay. In the end, to survive IBM had to think differently about who they were and what they did and set up a new way of operating, getting rid of leadership and workforce members who were completely unwilling to go outside of their comfort zone and rethink what it meant to be IBM in a new world order they didn’t control. If you want to create a company — not just a product — that stays the course your job is to be bothered, agitated, and uncomfortable all of the time. Nothing should ever be good enough. There should never be a desired end state. You can never be satisfied with how things are. Your compulsions should be to master moments before they get to you and improvise as required when they hit. There is no singular strategy, plan, or execution path that will hold the course against the external forcing functions of the world around you. And the world around you is infinite. 16. If you don’t want to feel crushed by it, don’t hold onto it. If there was one thing that I thought would take me out when my daughter was diagnosed it was the powerlessness to make it go away, to make everything ok for her and to restore her life to a healthy normal. For the first three days after she diagnosed I struggled to wake up, to move, to breathe. My chest was crushing me, my heart an Everest of grief and fear reaching higher and taking me into thinner air with every passing moment. On the third night I went into her bedroom to tuck her in, read her a bedtime story and hold her until she fell asleep. As she drifted to sleep I remembered a moment after my son when she had crawled into the hospital bed with me and to be held, to be reassured that she too was still my baby. Up until the moment I had held my newborn son in my arms, my daughter, then still 3, had felt so small, so in need of my protection, my love and my own fullness of life. But the moment she was with me in that hospital bed she was suddenly no longer the baby she had been. I remember being stunned at how big she was and feeling completely overwhelmed with this new realization of the size and space she now took up in my lap and my life. It was a profoundly bittersweet moment in mothering. Now, in the bed with her — my beautiful magic fairy stricken by this deadly silent cancer — she felt small again in my arms against the fear that was in my chest. Call it weird, irrational or just plain crazy — I could care fucking less — but in that moment I vowed to never let the fear in my chest feel bigger than her in my arms. Not.Fucking.Ever. I knew in that moment that I had to stop giving my fear a place to root and grow. I had to stop letting every moment with her feed it by wondering how far from the last it might be. The human mind is programmed to let the Lizard Brain take over when faced with catastrophe. The evolutionary rationale is that if left to our rational devices we might think we could talk our way out of being eaten by a hungry saber tooth tiger. It is imperative, in this modern age, when faced with real problems, not to let the Lizard Brain take over and instead evict the fear, embracing instead those things that are more important. Startup founders will be faced more than once with their own saber toothed tiger. It will leap out of a burned down runway, a shitty term sheet, a shitty partner, and frazzled team, or a shaky deal. The normal fear of failure that they live with will suddenly take a real, man-eating form and come at them. The best thing a founder who is facing the tiger can do is this: put your arms around someone or something who matters to you, close your eyes, breathe, and let them become the largest thing you are holding on to. Your job isn’t to give into fear, your job is to find the thing you love more than fear. When you can make a daily practice of feeling what you love more than feeling what you fear you will be able to define the steps you need to take next. Putting one foot in front of the other is what matters most. 17. You will find your new normal. And then you will find it again. For a few days after it was clear to me that my life had come completely and utterly undone and apart I felt adrift, floating through my days and my routine environments and daily encounters with other people as if I were a third party observer, witnessing the scenes but not really there. To be clear, it was one of the most liberating times of my life. I lost all sense of attachment to how things were, ought to be, and were going to go. Nothing was normal and I felt myself not wanting it ever to go back to that. Nothing ever did. The pain, the fear, the enormity of change that took over my life was nothing short of worth it and almost like a violent rebirth in its own right. I remember talking to a dear friend months after I had started to move through my new world order and after a couple of glasses of wine and when I described what I was feeling to her she said, “It sounds as though there the light at the end of the tunnel is in sight” and I laughed out loud and confessed, “So funny you should say that because the other day I had this completely fucked up sense that I was finally crowning!” We both laughed until we cried. We sold our house, my daughter had her surgeries, we crashed at a relatives for a couple of weeks, and then we moved. I switched jobs, the kids switched schools, my marriage finally crumbled, our new routine included specialists and more surgeries and tests, I walked away from a load of things I had started and started anew with my children, alone and tired but mostly but not completely unafraid. In three years we have had more changes than most people — with the exception of those facing severe wartime dangers, poverty, or extreme catastrophes — have had to face. There are two types of people in the world — those who get shit done and those who done. Those who get shit done do not waste their time with or talking about those who don’t. They know that every day they wake up is a gift and they choose to make it a day where they can do something that matters. I am lucky that I was born the kind of person who needs to get things done to feel that my life has a purpose. It is single handedly the reason that when the world beneath my feet kept shifting I was able to find balance. I had learned that I was good enough to do it and that it was my responsibility to teach it to my children. When you are a startup founder, there is no such thing as normal for most of your journey. Everything is moving — money, mission, vision, staff, partners, goals, tasking, market, competition. It is so quintessentially human to strive for stasis, to create a balance between input and output, to manage to the center of the axis. But the reality of a startup is the opposite of that. It is entropy. It is like the Theory of Everything all the time, everywhere, always. Your job as the founder is to accept it first so that you can figure out out to harness it. To find the patterns of opportunity in the disruption. To find the nuggets in the seam. To find the truth in the bullshit. If you strive only to create harmony, you will never have the perspective you need to see ahead of the curve, to anticipate change, to be flexible enough to dodge the bullet. 18. Celebrate what is working and is right. Several months into my daughter’s diagnosis, one of my partners put together a business development summit. The goal of the summit was to get political, thought, and entrepreneurial leaders in our region together to identify and discuss issues, opportunities, and ways ahead. Our little startup community — like so many of those other communities that Steve Case calls out in his Rise of the Rest tour — had some issues with launching itself into the bigger world of launches, venture capital, and brand name recognition. One our panelists, Bob Stolle, said something during a brief exchange with some of the participants about what made it hard for startups in our regions that rung so true with me it I live by it to this day: Don’t forget what you have that is working right, that gives you an advantage, that makes what you are dealing with better than some people have it because believe me, there are always people who have it so much harder than you do Bob was right in so many contexts. Within our own great state of Virginia I had seen first hand regions of populations with generations of a family living in a single room wood cabin with no running water or electricity. I had seen far reaching corners of the state with few people, majestic mountains and rivers and one or two enormous factories that dumped solvents into the mountain streams that fed those rivers. I had seen my own classmates’ family farms go belly up in the first great recession after decades of productivity and family succession. In our community — a bedroom community of Washington D.C. — we had a lot going for us despite those things that weren’t. We were less than an hour away from the capital of the world, 150 different universities and colleges, the internet hub of the world, and airports that could whisk us away to anywhere. I thought about Bob’s words often as we faced new tumors, new finding, and new unknowns with my daughter’s cancer. In the face of everything that was terrible about our situation, we had this: healthcare, a premier team of specialists, cars, money for gas, a roof over our heads, food, water, clothing, jobs, love — even if some of it was damaged beyond repair, grit, and hope. Startup founders must develop a daily habit of noticing what is going right and take time to honor and celebrate it with their team. This is not an exercise in being the world’s best PollyAnnas. Instead, it is choosing to recognize where there is opportunity, where you are doing something exceptionally well and discovering where your strength lives. Even if the outcome is not what you originally thought it would be, it will be far more in line with what you had hoped when you focus on and celebrate what is going right because those things are what you will bring forward with you when everything else fails and falls apart. 19. What you thought you would be doing is not what you will be doing. When my daughter’s cancer struck, my life was a shitshow on all fronts. My day job sucked and thanks to the economy and a rigid business model I had suffered a 20% paycut. Treatment for my stepson’s heroin addiction — or lawyers depending on what the particular circumstances were at the time — had created heavy financial burden, and my marriage was crumbling under the strain of that and the generalized dissatisfaction that can seep in over decades of togetherness. Our forever home which had almost doubled in market (and tax assessed) value within a year of building it was worth less than what we had paid for it eight years earlier. My 401K was down by 70%, and our savings was gone. My dream of a happy, healthy family with a storied life had become a nightmare. To do what needed to be done — to stabilize the financial hemorrhaging, to stay clear, present and accounted for with my children, to keep pace with my daughter’s cancer, and to make the best possible decisions — I had to let go of my dream of a happy, healthy, financially secure family. I unloaded my house, accepted that my marriage was going to fail and that I would be a single mom with two kids sooner rather than later and stopped thinking about my own future for a while. I let go of being vested in outcomes and focused instead on simply making as many decisions as I could to get to the next step only. Letting go of my dream was nothing short of devastating. It upended everything I thought to be true about myself, about my life and about my abilities to be good at something that mattered. But in that letting go, a strange thing happened — I found myself again and for the first time in years, despite the insanity around me, I felt at ease. A lot of startup founders I work with (mostly the men, FWIW) have a clear and ever-present vision of themselves at the helm, leading their charges into the unchartered territory of greatness. They seem themselves scoring big investment rounds, blowing away the competition, and building teams of aces. They see themselves delegating, briefing, unveiling, being interviewed and being responsible for doing something big. When you ask them what are the top three things they are going to get done after they leave the coffee shop where they have met you most of their answers are self-aggrandizing bullshit — I’m going to call that angel investor I heard would be all over this, or I am going to finish that pitch deck and check in with the guys and see how the code is going, or, I’m going to with some . Their attention and their actions are solely focused on the their fantasy in which they are center stage and their big idea has become the next big thing. It’s truly some of the most nauseating shit I have ever had to sit through and it’s my litmus test for whether or not I will waste my time with them again because what they should have said were things like: I am going to be talking to 50 college kids and getting their feedback on feature X, or, I am going to go to the mall with a couple of mocked up interfaces and ask random shoppers outside of Costco to push the buttons, or, I am going to go to host a pop-up shop outside of the yoga studio and see how many sweatbands I can sell. The reality for startup founders is more akin to mucking stalls than having a Jobs-like unveil in sunny California. If you ever want to see a profit or a term sheet you will have to talk to strangers face to face about your vision who won’t always understand what the hell you are saying or give you reliable feedback. You will have to put yourself, your shitty product, your dreams and your last dollar out there. You will spend countless hours on Google doing research and creating a repository of data to help determine courses of action. You will create a business model at 2AM only to revise it at 2PM because something you thought was true, wasn’t. You will code or learn to code and create multiple iterations of a product no one uses. You will have to learn how to navigate legal structures, financial documents, and labor laws. You will beg, borrow, plead, and negotiate with co-founders, lawyers, spouses, banks, and new hires. You will clean toilets and pull trash. You will spot paychecks from your savings and not take one yourself. You will be sucker punched by bullies. You will be deceived by people you trusted. You will have to clean up shit left behind by assholes you thought had your back. You will lay awake at night frozen with fear because everyday you will feel like you are on the edge of a cliff and feel tremors under your feet. To be lucky enough to be able to experience any of these you have to know that your vision might be wrong. What is as if not more important are the myriad of little, unsexy things you need to do everyday. And what is more important than that is knowing when you need to change what you are doing and create a new set of priorities, a new set of actions, a new approach. If you are married to your vision, if it is what you go back to at the end of a shitty day, you are probably going to fail. Shitty days are filled with important indicators and early warning signs of where your vision is flawed. To succeed, you have to do what needs to be done next to correct course, to reduce the suck, to keep forward momentum, to reframe or redefine your vision. You will have to do it whether you want to or not and at the most inopportune time in your life. You might have to fire a rockstar coder, boot your co-founder, or totally kill your product and start over. To know what needs to be done next, you have to embrace uncertainty and let go of your fantasy because your fantasy is a cloud. It is fluffy, opaque, fleeting, and 30,000 feet above you. By the very nature of its form, it prevents you from having the clarity and line of sight you need to take the next step. 20. Your startup is not your baby. Like many people,whose pets are the substitutes for the children they never had or the children who have grown and entered the world on their own. Just to get this out up front, I choke down a little rage every time I hear these people refer to their pets like they are children. As a parent of a child with cancer I would no more consider putting my child down because she has cancer than I would dropping a nuke on the Middle East to solve a problem whose origins are so complex and largely undiagnosed or understood. When I was a kid in college I knew a guy whose family was loaded. One of the buildings on our campus was named after his great-grandaddy. His parents had a 12 year old golden retriever who had a severe case of hip dysplasia. One summer, they spent $40,000 on hip replacements for that dog who ended up dying of natural causes two years later. I remember at the time thinking what a gross display of wealth that decision was. When my daughter was diagnosed I remembered wondering what I would do with that $40,ooo to find a cure for her and it was hard not to choke down vomit because I didn’t have it. Here’s the deal startup founders of the world: I don’t fucking care how much money you or your stupid family or no-nothing investors sunk into your startup. As soon as you know it’s a piece of shit that has a terminal disease called NO ONE GIVES A FUCK you need to kill it. Period. Your startup is NOT your baby. It is only an idea you tried to bring to life. It is not your flesh and blood and even though it depends on you for life there is a greater penalty for not killing it when you should then treating it like an actual child you brought into the world. I don’t know how to say this delicately so, apologies in advance. If you dare to consider your fucked up startup to be as something as precious and as deserving of life as my beautiful daughter you are an ego maniac with no fucking idea of what really matters, of what real responsibility is, and of what real love is. You are nothing more than an self-aggrandizing asshole and I hope your company fails so badly that TechCrunch and Forbes right about it for years to come as an example of how not to be a fucktard. The minute you know what you are trying to build is worthless, kill it. Your startup is not your baby and the sooner you kill it the sooner you might actually move on to do something that matters.
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*43Crz-YtOngKJjV2jKrAsg.jpeg

‘The Coach’ Of Wall Street, Bob Castrignano, Discusses Why Mentors Matter — Medium

$
0
0
‘The Coach’ of Wall Street, Bob Castrignano, Discusses Why Mentors Matter There are many faces of success and wealth in America, and while our capitalist system enables every American to tap into the greatness inside of them, it’s impossible to reach your goals alone. The road to success is winding, and mentors act as guardrails to keep you on track. I’ve been fortunate to have many great mentors throughout my career, but none have been a bigger part of my personal growth and professional success than Bob Castrignano, aka “The Coach.” On the latest episode of my podcast, The Motivation Inside (TMI), I had a chance to interview Bob about why, in business and in life, it’s so important to seek out mentors. Bob became known as “The Coach” during his 20 years at Goldman Sachs, where he mentored hundreds of young, ambitious, wet-behind-the-ears financiers. In addition to his gift for sniffing out promising investment opportunities, he also has an uncanny ability to recognize and nurture young talent — an attribute he shares with his close friend and fellow “Stamford guy,” legendary former Major League Baseball manager Bobby Valentine. Bobby V. always preached that if you have a gifted player, you should put him in a position to perform freely without having to think too hard. Bob took this advice to heart, applying it to great effect with young talent at Goldman Sachs. After I was fired from Goldman’s investment banking division, Bob (who at the time was an executive director in the company’s wealth management business) rehired me to work on the firm’s equities sales and trading desk. He recognized my limitations on the technical side of the business, as well as my insecurity about having been fired, but recognized my natural interpersonal skills. He moved me into a sales role better fitting my skill-set, and assigned me to a soft-spoken manager, Tony Lauto, who could harness my ambition and energy. (Tony, who remains a close friend, hatched the idea to buy Mike Piazza’s symbolic 9/11 jersey and bring it back home to New York.) During our conversation on TMI, Bob also emphasized the importance of commitment and finishing things you start. After getting fired and rehired by Goldman Sachs and then refusing to relinquish my $11,000 severance check (which I had already spent chipping away at a mountain of student loan debt), I immediately asked for two weeks off. The HR department thought I was certifiably insane! But the “vacation” was for a good cause — to prepare for my third shot at passing the New York State Bar exam. I had no interest in becoming a lawyer, but after graduating from Harvard Law School had promised my mother I would pass the Bar (which if you’re Italian is no small thing!). Bob got me the two weeks off (with pay!), and after studying 16 hours a day for two weeks, I passed the Bar in February 1992. Even amid less-than-ideal circumstances, Bob applauded my commitment to keeping promises and achieving goals — because nobody embodies steadfastness more than “The Coach.” On September 11, 2001, Sandler O’Neill + Partners lost 66 employees in the World Trade Center, 23 of whom were part of the equities division. With the firm’s equities business decimated, my brother David and I invited Bob (who had recently retired from Goldman Sachs with the intention of going into education) to assist us in helping Sandler O’Neill through its personal and professional crisis. Our mission began on Monday, September 17, 2001, the day the New York Stock Exchange reopened. In addition to providing support to Ground Zero workers, we spent two weeks volunteering in an effort to prevent Sandler O’Neill from going under. Bob, though, realized it would take a great deal of time to see the company survive those dark days. There was only one not-so-small problem: after his retirement from Goldman, Bob signed a non-compete agreement that precluded him from working in a competing role on Wall Street. Goldman never waived non-compete clauses. However, when Bob approached John Thain and Bob Steele, then-members of Goldman’s senior management team, in recognition of the extraordinary circumstances they allowed an exception to the non-compete agreement so he could officially go to work for Sandler O’Neill. The humanity and patriotism demonstrated by all three men enabled Sandler O’Neill to once again flourish. “The Coach” remains a principal in the equities division he helped rebuild, and a peerless mentor for an entire generation of Wall Street talent. You can listen to the entire TMI podcast episode with Bob Castrignano below or here: https://soundcloud.com/skybridge-insights/7-coaching-the-mind-with-sandler-oneill-partner-bob-castrignano.
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*Qr40nIHdTnLp0EQV3WHYCw.jpeg

Artificial Intelligence Is Changing SEO Faster Than You Think

$
0
0
John Rampton Crunch Network Contributor John Rampton is founder of online invoicing company Due. More posts by this contributor: The broken world of mobile payments and how to fix it What Zuckerberg And Gates Teaming Up Really Means For Clean Energy In 2016 How to join the network By now everyone has heard of Google’s RankBrain, the new artificial intelligence machine learning algorithm that is supposed to be the latest and greatest from Mountain View, Calif. What many of you might not realize, however, is just how fast the SEO industry is changing because of it. In this article, I’ll take you through some clear examples of how some of the old rules of SEO no longer apply, and what steps you can take to stay ahead of the curve in order to continue to provide successful SEO campaigns for your businesses. So what is artificial intelligence? There are generally three different classifications of artificial intelligence: Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI): This is like AI for one particular thing (e.g. beating the world champion in chess). Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): This is when the AI can perform all things. Once an AI can perform like a human, we consider it AGI. Artificial Superintelligence (ASI): AI on a much higher level for all things (e.g. beyond the capabilities of a single human). When we talk about the context of Google’s RankBrain, and the machine learning algorithms that are currently running on Google, we are talking about Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI). Actually, ANI has been around for some time. Ever wonder how those SPAM filters work in your email? Yep, that’s ANI. Here are some of my favorite ANI programs: Google Translate, IBM’s Watson, that cool feature on Amazon that tells you products that are “recommended for you,” self-driving cars and, yes, our beloved Google’s RankBrain. Within ANI, there are many different approaches. As Pedro Domingos clearly lays out in his book The Master Algorithm, data scientists trying to achieve the perfect AI can be grouped into five “tribes” today: Symbolists Connectionists Evolutionaries Bayesians Analogizers Google’s RankBrain is in the camp of the Connectionists. Connectionists believe that all our knowledge is encoded in the connections between neurons in our brain. And RankBrain’s particular strategy is what experts in the field call a back propagation technique, rebranded as “deep learning.” Connectionists claim this strategy is capable of learning anything from raw data, and therefore is also capable of ultimately automating all knowledge discovery. Google apparently believes this, too. On January 26th, 2014, Google announced it had agreed to acquire DeepMind Technologies, which was, essentially, a back propagation shop. So when we talk about RankBrain, we now can tell people it is comprised of one particular technique (back propagation or “deep learning”) on ANI. Now that we have that out of the way, just how much is this field progressing? And, more importantly, how is it changing the business of SEO? The exponential growth of technology (and AI) Tim Urban from WaitButWhy.com explains the growth of technology better than anyone in his article The AI Revolution: The Road to Superintelligence. Here is what technological progress looks like, when you look back at history: But, as Urban points out, in reality, you can’t see what’s to your right (the future). So here is how it actually feels when you are standing there: What this chart shows is that when humans try to predict the future, they always underestimate. This is because they are looking to the left of this graph, instead of to the right. However, the reality is, human progress takes place at a faster and faster rate as time goes on. Ray Kurzweil calls this the Law of Accelerating Returns. The scientific reasoning behind his original theory is that more advanced societies have the ability to progress at a faster rate than less advanced societies — because they’re more advanced. Of course, the same can be applied to artificial intelligence and the growth rate we are seeing now with advanced technology. We see this with computing resources right now. Here is a visualization that gives you the perspective of just how fast things can change because of this Law of Accelerating Returns: As you can clearly see, and as we all can intuitively feel, the growth of advanced processing and computers has benefited from this Law of Accelerating Returns. Here is another shocking revelation: At some point, the processing power for an economical computer will surpass that of not only a single human, but for all humans combined. In fact, it now appears that we will be able to achieve Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) some time around 2025. Technology is clearly expanding at a faster and faster pace, and, by many accounts, most of us will be caught off guard. The rise of superintelligence As I have explained above, Google’s RankBrain is just one form of ANI, which means that, while it can perform things better than a human in one specific area, it is just that: a relatively weak form of artificial intelligence. But we may be blindsided by how fast this “weak” intelligence might easily turn into something with which we have no idea how to deal. Here, you can clearly see that Google’s RankBrain, while super intelligent on one particular task, is still in the general context of things, fairly unintelligent on the intelligence scale. But what happens when we apply the same Law of Accelerating Returns to artificial intelligence? Tim Urban walks us through the thought experiment: “…so as A.I. zooms upward in intelligence toward us, we’ll see it as simply becoming smarter, for an animal. Then, when it hits the lowest capacity of humanity — Nick Bostrom uses the term ‘the village idiot’ — we’ll be like, ‘Oh wow, it’s like a dumb human. Cute!’ The only thing is, in the grand spectrum of intelligence, all humans, from the village idiot to Einstein, are within a very small range — so just after hitting village idiot level and being declared to be AGI, it’ll suddenly be smarter than Einstein and we won’t know what hit us.” So what does this mean for the business of SEO and the artificial intelligence that is upon us? SEO has changed forever Before we get into predicting the future, let’s take inventory on how RankBrain has already changed SEO. I sat down with Carnegie Mellon alumnus and friend Scott Stouffer, now CTO and co-founder of Market Brew, a company that provides search engine models for Fortune 500 SEO teams. As a search engineer himself, Stouffer had a unique perspective over the past decade that most professionals in that industry don’t get to see. Here are some of his tips for the SEO industry when it comes to Google’s new emphasis on artificial intelligence. Today’s regression analysis is seriously flawed This is the biggest current fallacy of our industry. There have been many prognosticators every time Google’s rankings shift in a big way. Usually, without fail, a few data scientists and CTOs from well-known companies in our industry will claim they “have a reason!” for the latest Google Dance. The typical analysis consists of perusing through months of ranking data leading up to the event, then seeing how the rankings shifted across all websites of different types. With today’s approach to regression analysis, these data scientists point to a specific type of website that has been affected (positively or negatively) and conclude with high certainty that Google’s latest algorithmic shift was attributed to a specific type of algorithm (content or backlink, et al.) that these websites shared. However, that isn’t how Google works anymore. Google’s RankBrain, a machine learning or deep learning approach, works very differently. Within Google, there are a number of core algorithms that exist. It is RankBrain’s job to learn what mixture of these core algorithms is best applied to each type of search results. For instance, in certain search results, RankBrain might learn that the most important signal is the META Title. Adding more significance to the META Title matching algorithm might lead to a better searcher experience. But in another search result, this very same signal might have a horrible correlation with a good searcher experience. So in that other vertical, another algorithm, maybe PageRank, might be promoted more. This means that, in each search result, Google has a completely different mix of algorithms. You can now see why doing regression analysis over every site, without having the context of the search result that it is in, is supremely flawed. For these reasons, today’s regression analysis must be done by each specific search result. Stouffer recently wrote about a search modeling approach where the Google algorithmic shifts can be measured. First, you can take a snapshot of what the search engine model was calibrated to in the past for a specific keyword search. Then, re-calibrate it after a shift in rankings has been detected, revealing the delta between the two search engine model settings. Using this approach, during certain ranking shifts, you can see which particular algorithm is being promoted or demoted in its weighting. When humans try to predict the future, they always underestimate. Having this knowledge, we can then focus on improving that particular part of SEO for sites for those unique search results. But that same approach will not (and cannot) hold for other search results. This is because RankBrain is operating on the search result (or keyword) level. It is literally customizing the algorithms for each search result. Stay niche to avoid misclassification What Google also realized is that they could teach their new deep learning system, RankBrain, what “good” sites look like, and what “bad” sites look like. Similar to how they weight algorithms differently for each search result, they also realized that each vertical had different examples of “good” and “bad” sites. This is undoubtedly because different verticals have different CRMs, different templates and different structures of data altogether. When RankBrain operates, it is essentially learning what the correct “settings” are for each environment. As you might have guessed by now, these settings are completely dependent on the vertical on which it is operating. So, for instance, in the health industry, Google knows that a site like WebMD.com is a reputable site that they would like to have near the top of their searchable index. Anything that looks like the structure of WebMD’s site will be associated with the “good” camp. Similarly, any site that looks like the structure of a known spammy site in the health vertical will be associated with the “bad” camp. As RankBrain works to group “good” and “bad” sites together, using its deep learning capabilities, what happens if you have a site that has many different industries all rolled up into one? First, we have to discuss a bit more detail on how exactly this deep learning works. Before grouping together sites into a “good” and “bad” bucket, RankBrain must first determine what each site’s classification is. Sites like Nike.com and WebMD.com are pretty easy. While there are many different sub-categories on each site, the general category is very straightforward. These types of sites are easily classifiable. But what about sites that have many different categories? A good example of these types of sites are the How-To sites. Sites that typically have many broad categories of information. In these instances, the deep learning process breaks down. Which training data does Google use on these sites? The answer is: It can be seemingly random. It may choose one category or another. For well-known sites, like Wikipedia, Google can opt-out of this classification process altogether, to ensure that the deep learning process doesn’t undercut their existing search experience (aka “too big to fail”). The field of SEO will continue to become extremely technical. But for lesser-known entities, what will happen? The answer is, “Who knows?” Presumably, this machine learning process has an automated way of classifying each site before attempting to compare it to other sites. Let’s say a How-To site looks just like WebMD’s site. Great, right? Well, if the classification process thinks this site is about shoes, then it is going to be comparing the site to Nike’s site structure, not WebMD’s. It just might turn out that their site structure looks a lot like a spammy shoe site, as opposed to a reputable WebMD site, in which case the overly generalized site could easily be flagged as SPAM. If the How-To site had separate domains, then it would be easy to make each genre look like the best of that industry. Stay niche. These backlinks smell fishy Let’s take a look at how this affects backlinks. Based on the classification procedure above, it is more important than ever to stick within your “linking neighborhood,” as RankBrain will know if something is different from similar backlink profiles in your vertical. Let’s take the same example as above. Say a company has a site about shoes. We know that RankBrain’s deep learning process will attempt to compare each aspect of this site with the best and worst sites of the shoe industry. So, naturally, the backlink profile of this site will be compared to the backlink profiles of these best and worst sites. Let’s also say that a typical reputable shoe site has backlinks from the following neighborhoods: Sports Health Fashion Now let’s say that the company’s SEO team decides to start pursuing backlinks from all these neighborhoods, plus a new neighborhood — from one of the CEO’s previous connections to the auto industry. They are “smart” about it as well: They construct a cross-marketing “free shoe offer for all new leases” page that is created on the auto site, which then links to their new type of shoe. Totally relevant, right? Related Articles The next AI is no AI The funny things happening on the way to singularity Google launches Gboard, an iOS keyboard that lets you search without a browser Well, RankBrain is going to see this and notice that this backlink profile looks a lot different than the typical reputable shoe site. Worse yet, it finds that a bunch of spammy shoe sites also have a backlink profile from auto sites. Uh oh. And just like that, without even knowing what is the “correct” backlink profile, RankBrain has sniffed out what is “good” and what is “bad” for its search engine results. The new shoe site is flagged, and their organic traffic takes a nosedive. The future of SEO and artificial intelligence As we can see from the previous discussion on the Law of Accelerating Returns, RankBrain and other forms of artificial intelligence will at some point surpass the human brain. And at this point, nobody knows where this technology will lead us. Some things are certain, though: Each competitive keyword environment will need to be examined on its own; Most sites will need to stay niche to avoid misclassification; and Each site should mimic the structure and composition of their respective top sites in that niche. In some ways, the deep learning methodology makes things simpler for SEOs. Knowing that RankBrain and similar technologies are almost on par with a human, the rule of law is clear: There are no more loopholes. In other ways, things are a bit harder. The field of SEO will continue to become extremely technical. Analytics and big data are the order of the day, and any SEO that isn’t familiar with these approaches has a lot of catching up to do. Those of you who have these skills can look forward to a big payday. Featured Image: Maya2008/Shutterstock
image url: 
https://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/3.png?w=975&h=548

7 Things Every Startup Should Learn From Marvel

$
0
0
Captain America : Civil War just crossed the $1 Billion mark at the worldwide box office and marked the beginning of phase 3 of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) with a bang. It is the first movie released in 2016 to cross this milestone and the fourth out of the thirteen released by Marvel, some hit rate! And with this the MCU also became the first movie franchise in history to gross over $10 Billion collectively! Seems like everything they touch turns into Vibranium. Coming from bankruptcy in 1997 to a $4 Billion buyout by Walt disney in 2010 to being one of the biggest multi media franchisees in the world, this is quite a turnaround story. And like any good success story, there is lots that startups can learn from Marvel. So here are the 7 things every startup can learn from Marvel 1. Hiring and Employee management Probably the most important factor in a startup’s success, the team is also the toughest to get right. A right team and half your battle is won. Marvel, with its movie, television and gazillion other sub units is a great company to learn the secrets of team building from. As Richard Branson so rightly said Employees come first. Take care of your employees and they will take care of your clients. Hiring great employees and retaining them should come first in any startup! And this is something evident in Marvel’s working. Finding the right people : Have a look at the list of directors that helm these mega budgeted Marvel movies and what do you notice, not many big names there! It has been a conscious effort by the heads at Marvel to not go after big names and instead get who they feel is the best guy for the job but not quite blown up on the world scene yet, the perfect startup hiring strategy. Reward them : When Marvel does get someone good and they deliver, they are rightly rewarded. The Russo brothers had only directed one full length movie way back in 2006 before being shortlisted to head Captain America : The winter soldier in 2014. And fast forward 2 years, the guys are virtually on the top of the Marvel pyramid having lead Civil War to victory and ready to helm Marvel’s magnum opus, The Avengers : Infinity saga. 2. Planning Startups have to master the fine art of staying in the present with an eye on the future on a daily basis. Yet, in the constant daily struggles for survival many ignore the future. The business plans and vision documents stay just that, documents, that are never utilized or followed. But not with Marvel, they like to plan for the future, sometimes way into the future! Thanos, the mad titan, made an appearance at the end of the first Avengers movie signalling his intent to destroy earth by capturing the infinity stones. Something that he will probably do 13 movies later in the infinity saga. Iron man released in 2008 had Nick fury discuss the Avengers initiative with Tony Stark laying the premise for the first Avengers movie that released in 2012. Marvel is known to sign up their actors in huge multi movie contracts, 9 movies in some cases, clearly showing how detailed their planning is when taking something up 3. Experimentation Though Marvel isn’t the first nor the only media company to venture into films, they surely have been the most successful. And a really important factor in that is their ability to experiment. Crossover films : The entire concept of having different lead characters exist in the same shared universe was pioneered by Marvel. And it has paid its dividends, 3 of their 4 biggest movies (Avengers 1 &2 and civil war) have been these multi superhero sagas. Moving away from popular comic characters and introducing new ones like the Guardians of the Galaxy made sure the universe doesn’t get repetitive. 4. Pivot Its all cocktails and shawarmas when everything is going right, but what happens when it doesn’t. Knowing when to pivot is one of the most critical decisions a startup has to take. And Marvel sure understands this When the incredible hulk didn’t do well at the box office, the franchisee was stopped. Moreover, the lead star Edward Norton was replaced by Mark Ruffalo for the Avengers and the results are there for all to see. 5. Partnership and collaboration How common is it to see incredibly talented founding teams with great ideas not making it solely because they remained in their shell and were too afraid to venture out. Having the right partnerships plays a key role in any business’s success and Marvel shows us just the right way to do it The deal they struck with Sony pictures which allows them to bring the friendly neighborhood superhero Spiderman to the MCU is such a masterstroke Well you have great characters, good movies in the pipeline but no experience in movie distribution or worldwide presence. What do you do? You bring in Walt ‘I am everywhere’ Disney to take care of that for you. 6. Survival Everyday in a startup is about survival. With the amount of uncertainty that exists in almost every aspect of your daily work, just making it through without crashing is an achievement is itself. And Marvel has the ultimate survival instinct The company went bankrupt in 1996. To stay afloat it used everything in its tanker from theme park deals to restaurant agreements and to the big one, licensing some of its trademarked characters like the X -Men , Blade and Spider man to other studios. 7. Diversify It’s great to rest on your laurels and keep doing the same stuff when things seem to be going good but in reality that is the time to press home your advantage and diversify. And a lot of once big companies fall from grace because they weren’t able to do this when at their prime. But not Marvel, having tasted success with movies they were quick to move and are now present everywhere from cable television, to network and netflix and still growing. We understand that startups are hard and lonely and a small word of motivation daily works as a great tool in the daily startup battles we all fight. We are soon launching Startup snips — Your daily 2 minute dose of startup motivation and hacks, delivered directly to your email. Sign up to get highly curated content, proven methods and hacks summarized into a 2 minute read daily. In addition just for you get an exclusive early stage startup starter kit and the ultimate hack to be more productive and positive instantly. Check out startupsnips.co
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1200/1*MN2ws6bFeaQuP2ag93Miwg.png

What I Learned From Working At A Startup Company In Indonesia

$
0
0
It is not surprising, the term of “startup company” is being adopted across the world, especially in the areas of the technology company. We overwhelmed with the success stories of how startup company can be brought better technologies into our life. In Indonesia, the startup company is mushrooming in huge numbers today. Some of them now backed up with the big amount of money from their investor. The good news starts from one of the local internet companies, Tokopedia. In 2014, they got seed about 100 million USD from Softbank and Sequioa capital. Became the largest round for the Indonesian startup at that moment. From there, it is like the eye of the world is now overseeing the Indonesian startup ecosystem, and Now we can easily find the other splendid news from Indonesian startup companies who being backed up, or being acquired and even being born in this ecosystem. In this article, I’d like to share what I learned (so far) from working in one of startup companies in Indonesia. Currently I am working as a UX designer at Tokopedia, part of the Tokopedia product team. Fantastic Working Culture I have experience living in Europe for several years, it is not secret anymore that people in the developed country are more likely open minded and could help you to improve your knowledge. The biggest thing that I scared off when I back to my Indonesia is the culture shock. I was scared that people, especially in my working environment would have a different culture that I used to feel while living abroad. I was afraid that I couldn’t adapt very well in the company. I was wrong, absolutely wrong. From the first week working here, I felt that the culture is better than I expecting. They have the sincerity to share like a teacher, and humility to learn like a student. Yes, it’s true, I learned new things almost in every single day in here. In the product team, we have a sharing session routines every two weeks. I believed another teams also have that kind of sessions. In the sharing session we shared everything with each other in the teams, from knowledges, experience, problem and tips and trick. The aim of the session, every each person in the team can grow their mindset together in the positive way. Product sharing sessionResponsibilities are more, but the opportunities are more too Since the very beginning, everyone was given the important task, I felt that people in the team trust each others. Your idea and your work will be easily noticeable, startup company has less people, it means everybody’s role is important. You will be more critical about your work, you will be more responsible and reliable. At Tokopedia it self we have own internal hackathon, I heard some of startup in Indonesia also already start their own internal hackathon. This opportunity allows people in the company build their own crazy and impossible idea collaborated with people from different functions. The results are super amazing, many brilliant ideas come from this event and being implemented into real products or features. Hackhaton in TokopediaFind new family Because you work in a small team, you will more close to each other in the team. Somehow, there will be a special bond with people in your team. You will be amazed by how people in your team care about you. They will always right there when you need them. You can trust them because they also trusted you. Tokopedia called the employees with “Nakama”, Nakama implies a much stronger or deeper friendship, and usually refers to someone who is like family. While it originated to mean a colleague or someone of like-minded-ness or purpose. Product team of TokopediaWork Hard , Play Harder ! Yes play harder than your work!, startup companies is fulfilled by many young talented people. So they design the working environment for the youngster soul. Cool working spaces, playground, gym facilities is not strange anymore that can be found in the startup office. Even you can use your shirt and sandals when you are working. Some of the company also gives the flexible working hours so you don’t have to wake up in the morning. pingpong tournament in the officeIt’s sound interesting, isn’t? Yap, the article above is my humble opinion that I felt in this 9 months I’ve been working in a startup company. If you never try, you never know Good Luck !
image url: 
https://cdn-images-2.medium.com/max/800/1*XnHUA8y4QBefIQr7Ntk3NQ.jpeg

How To Start A Food Truck 01: Should You Go Mobile Or Brick And Mortar?

$
0
0
Welcome to the first chapter of our new blog series: How to Start a Food Truck. If you’ve ever wondered how to start a food truck business, you’ve come to the right place! Over the next several months, we’re going to take you all the way from the very first seeds of your dream to opening day. Our goal is to help every food truck owner — from the seasoned veterans to the aspiring dreamers like you — take his or her business to the next level by providing the #1 resource of food truck business know-how. That’s why we’re so stoked to bring you an unprecedented level of in-depth information in the “How to Start a Food Truck” series — a comprehensive, chronological, and crazy-awesome guide to starting your very own food truck business. What’s the first stop on our epic business planning road trip? Helping you decide whether or not a food truck is the right business model for you by looking at some of the differences between food trucks and brick and mortar restaurants. After all, all good cooks know that the baseline ingredients make or break the dish. Let’s make sure the most basic and important of business decisions is the right one for your tastes! If you’re ready to go, let’s get started by defining the single-most important part of this entire journey — your dream. Defining Your Dream It’s no secret that career satisfaction plays a major role in determining our overall levels of happiness in life. Doing work that you love can seriously fulfill your life and nourish your soul — the key is to figure out what it is that you really want. Are you entranced by the idea of a mobile restaurant that gives you the freedom to move around each day? Or do you dream of owning an establishment where you can decorate the walls with your favorite photos and have a special booth for your favorite customers? Imagine yourself in 10 years. Where are you — smiling through the window of a food truck that’s clocked thousands of miles as you greet a family who comes by every Friday night, or walking the well-worn floors of your restaurant and checking in on every table’s meals? It’s easy to predict what some people might choose. Think of it this way: If you enjoy travel, discovering new cuisines, and exploring your city, you might thrive on the flexibility offered by a food truck. Aspiring entrepreneurs who are eager to get their hands dirty and get excited by the thought of a road trip will love the daily travel and adventures involved in owning a food truck. On the other hand, if you prefer stable routines, dream of being a famous chef, and love to host big parties for your friends and family, you might prefer the opportunities that accompany restaurant ownership. If the idea of traveling constantly exhausts you and you’re afraid to refill the windshield wiper fluid in your car, you’ll probably enjoy life in a comfortable, reliable building more than life on the road. Or perhaps your dream involves a little bit of both. After all, some people get started in the food truck industry as a stepping stone to their larger dream of owning a restaurant. You might be excited to get in on the food truck trend while it’s hot so that you can build a name for yourself and open that chain of restaurants you’ve always dreamed about somewhere down the line — and that’s okay. Every one of these options is a valid choice, so long as you realize that regardless of your long-term path, you need to fully understand the realities of each situation before making any choices. Entering the food industry is risky business — like any entrepreneurial endeavor — but you can make a calculated, informed decision about your dream when you know what life as a food truck or restaurant owner is really like. Examining the Realities Let’s look at some of the key differences between owning a food truck and owning a restaurant to help you understand what you’re getting yourself into. Getting Started Opening a Food Truck: There’s no doubt about it: starting a food truck is cheaper than starting a restaurant. Forbes estimates that most food truck ventures can get started for between $50,000 and $80,000, while a restaurant will typically cost at least $100,000 to $300,000 to get up and running. If your specialty is sandwiches or gourmet cookies, you’re going to need a lot of…well, a lot of dough! Obviously, the biggest expense involved with either a truck or a restaurant is the physical space from which you’ll operate — and a truck is much cheaper than a brick and mortar location, particularly if you can find a used truck that is already outfitted to function as a mobile kitchen. You’ll also run into similar costs such as insurance, licenses and permits, marketing expenses, and staff salaries with either type of establishment. But again, each of these categories requires fewer funds when you’re aiming to open a food truck instead of an entire food building. Opening a Restaurant: Opening a restaurant costs more, but the upside is that you’ll probably run into fewer legal restrictions than someone who is trying to start a food truck. Many cities across the country have laws in place that aren’t very friendly toward food truck owners. Aspiring FoodTruckrs have trouble getting operating permits, difficulty finding places to park, and face strict requirements about the size and standards of their trucks. Worst of all, they must navigate an entirely new set of laws every time they cross city lines. Though aspiring restaurateurs must lock down a number of permits and licenses for everything from operating to serving alcohol, health code and food handling laws are designed with them in mind. You’ll also only need to figure out the requirements for the one city where your building is actually located. The food industry as a whole is more welcoming to entrepreneurs who are opening brick and mortar establishments — and for some people, this could be worth part of the additional expense. The Perfect Spot Owning a Food Truck: The ability to move around is one of the greatest perks of owning a food truck. When there’s an event going on, you can take your truck to where people are. If someone wants you to cater a wedding or festival, you’ve already got a way to transport and serve your food on the go. And if you’re experiencing a slow day without many customers, it’s easy to pack up and move on to somewhere with a little more action. Of course, no one said that opening a food truck is easy — so even this bright spot brings along some challenges. Finding a place to park can be one of the toughest parts of owning a food truck. Many cities have strict laws in place regarding where and when you can park your truck and for how long — and if you violate those ordinances, you could find yourself faced with a heavy fine that eats away an entire day’s worth (or more) of profits. Local governments are hungry, and they don’t accept burritos and cheesesteaks as payment. Owning a Restaurant: When you own a restaurant, you clearly don’t need to worry about finding anywhere to park. A stable location also has an added benefit: Customers will always know where to find you, which makes it easy to build repeat business over time. However, if you don’t have a good location, your business could be doomed before it’s time to change your calendar page to the next month. So, finding a prime location is the simple solution, right? Not so fast — good locations almost always have higher rent, and they might not be available when you want them. Though a food truck owner has to find a good spot every day, he or she can move on easily if it doesn’t work out. A restaurant owner needs to find a location that he or she will be happy with for many, many years. The Daily Grind Operating a Food Truck: Time for a truth-bomb: Food truck owners work long hours. This industry isn’t for the faint of heart. Even before you open for business (and even once you’re done serving for the day), there’s dicing, slicing, mixing, and other miscellaneous prep work to be done — plus an entire kitchen to be cleaned. The area you have to maintain and clean every day is a lot smaller than it would be if you owned a full restaurant, but you also won’t have as many people to help out. With a smaller team working on your truck, that means you’re going to be doing a lot more of the grunt work on your own. And though you have less space inside your truck to clean, you also need tomaintain the mechanical workings of your truck. A restaurant can’t get a flat tire, but something as seemingly insignificant as a stray nail or a shard of broken glass could derail a FoodTruckr for an entire day if he or she is caught off guard and gets stuck somewhere. Your food truck needs regular oil changes and tune-ups just like your car does, so be prepared to spend some time (and money) at your favorite mechanic’s shop. Operating a Restaurant: Brick and mortar restaurant owners enjoy a lot more space to work and serve customers than food truck owners — but that also means that cleanup at the end of the night is going to take more time. In addition to cleaning your larger kitchen, there’s also floors to vacuum, tables to clean and reset, menus to wipe down, and a lot more food that needs to be dated and sorted regularly to prevent expiration. While you have a much larger area to clean, you also probably have more hands on deck to help out. As the restaurant owner, you can hire a staff of servers, hosts, bartenders, and table bussers to handle some of the more unappealing parts of maintaining your space. Running a restaurant is typically more of a team effort than running a food truck, where the bulk of the work often falls on one or two sets of shoulders. Of course, having a larger team also means that you have to find more qualified applicants and train more newbies — and sign more paychecks every week. Evaluating the Risk Investing in a Food Truck: You can almost certainly open a food truck for less than six figures, but getting your truck up and running off the ground is going to require a lot of planning and a lot of time. Navigating your area’s local laws and restrictions will be challenging, especially if you’re new to the industry and unfamiliar with the policies in your area. Of course, that’s where FoodTruckr comes in — we’re here to make the process a little easier. According to a report by the National League of Cities, food trucks made approximately $650 million in 2012 — and that figure is expected to quadruple to $2.7 billion by the year 2017. Food trucks are more than just a hot trend. They’re quickly becoming one of the fastest-growing and most flexible small business opportunities for entrepreneurs around the country. However, that doesn’t mean there isn’t risk involved. Before you make this decision, understand that a lot of aspiring truck owners never make it as far as actually purchasing a truck because they get overwhelmed by all the red tape and challenges along the way. It’s a tough business, and you need to be prepared to dive in headfirst if you want to make it. Investing in a Restaurant: As we established earlier, opening a restaurant requires a huge monetary investment upfront. You’re looking at spending at least six figures, and most likely several hundreds of thousands of dollars. There used to be a popular myth that said that nine out of ten new restaurants would fail in the first year. That statistic has since been proven false by researchers from places such as Ohio State University, who instead estimate that around 60 percent of new restaurants will fail within the first three years of business. That’s still a big risk to take right off the bat for a small-time entrepreneur with a dream — and you may have trouble finding someone to finance your aspirations. However, restaurants aren’t going anywhere any time soon. People will always need to eat and they’ll always be willing to pay someone else to prepare their food for them and to deliver an enjoyable experience. You’ll just need to remember that there are a lot of other people out there who have the same dream as you — and having great food, a great staff, and a great location are only the first things you’ll need to do to set yourself apart. Choose Your Destiny Whether you opt for a food truck or a restaurant, the realities of the food industry can feel a little daunting and discouraging. Don’t let them get you down! At FoodTruckr, we believe in pursuing big dreams not because they are easy — but because they are worth it. We also believe that if you’re really determined to make a successful go of this journey, it’s smart to learn about the path that lies ahead of you. And most importantly, we believe in you and your ambition to squash hunger with magical, mouth-watering meals. With that in mind, the only thing you have to decide is what will work best for your business model and your dreams — a food truck, a brick and mortar, or perhaps both. Consider your options thoroughly and create a business plan that outlines what you really want, how you’ll achieve it, and where you’ll find the funding to get started. You have a tough decision to make that will spawn further difficult choices, but if you approach your choice with vigor, you will bend the circumstances to your will. After all, the way you respond to each new challenge will determine your likelihood of success. Coming up next: In the second chapter of “How to Start a Food Truck,” we’ll get down to one of the most fun parts of planning — deciding what you’ll sell and coming up with a concept for your truck. In the meantime, visit our Facebook page to tell us what questions you have and to connect with other aspiring food truck owners who can support you on your journey. See you next week! This blog originally posted on Foodtruckr.com on January 8, 2014.
image url: 

10 Things I Learned From Looking At 600 Pitch Deck reviews

$
0
0
Image Credit: hatoriz / Shutterstock.com Getting face time with a venture capitalist or angel investor can be next to impossible. Often you have to rely on quick intros, a pitch competition, or a friend’s promise to pass along a message. Once you have a foot in the door, you’ll need to win over an investor with your pitch deck. Tailoring the deck to the individual investor is vital to the successful launch of your business. The perfect pitch deck is thorough but concise, covering a variety of topics (but not too many!) and offering a strategy that is ambitious but not unrealistic. In my role as chief architect of the App Idea Awards, I’ve seen evaluations from venture capitalists, angel investors, and successful entrepreneurs of more than 600 pitch decks. Based on that input, I’ve homed in on the strategies that could be a boon to your success and the ones that could spell disaster. 1. DO consider the audience Before you start putting together your deck, you should be able to answer three questions: what, who, and how? You should consider how to structure your answers based on the communications channel you are using. For example, how are you pitching this idea? If the pitch is happening in person, and especially if it’s happening at a competition like Startup Battlefield, you should keep the deck simple, driving home the most important points with bullets and leaving the rest to be spoken. With written pitches you won’t be there to discuss nuances, so make sure your content is thorough enough to explain your business model. At the same time, don’t over-explain. There’s no need to define common tech lingo that the investors will already know. 2. DO have a focus The best products fill a variety of needs but have a primary function. Many entrepreneurs who entered the App Idea Awards treated their decks like a Shamwow or Salad Shooter infomercial, listing off dozens of possible applications. Being multi-purpose may help you attract more customers in the future, but at the early stage, investors will see this as a sign that you lack focus and can’t think strategically. Your focus should be obvious throughout your pitch, and your tagline should pass the “grandma test” (would your grandma understand it?). Simple language that touches on common experiences can usually stand alone. If your focus is both easy to understand and exciting, you’re in great shape for pitching. 3. DO get there fast Staying focused is important, but even more important is getting to your main focus fast. Start by laying out the problem, which tells the audience why they should care about your idea, and then explain what the product does within the first two slides of the presentation. You may not have an investor’s attention for much longer than two slides, especially if he or she is in high demand. 4. DO have a user acquisition plan The last two do’s will help you seal the deal, and they both come down to money. Investors are excited by big ideas, but they also have a responsibility to their limited partners to provide a return on investment. You must know how you’re going to get your product into potential users’ hands and how much it will cost you to do so. You should know your CAC (cost of customer acquisition), which is the total cost of marketing divided by the number of users acquired. In calculating the CAC, you’ll need to consider what marketing tactics you plan to use, whether it’s ads, events, or guerilla marketing. During the App Idea Awards, investors rejected many pitch decks because they didn’t have a solid launch strategy. 5. DO demonstrate profitability (or at least a road to it) While Instagram may have found success without an initial monetization strategy, hundreds of thousands of other companies have failed because they didn’t think about profit. In your pitch, show a business model that is or can become profitable. The most important thing is to make sure your model is viable. During judging, investors saw several apps built on user-generated content that actually charged the user to provide content. This concept causes friction in the model, and investors immediately dismissed it. Now that you know what to do, let’s take a look at some definite don’ts. 1. DON’T try to do it alone There are no commercially successful one-man bands. Your team should be diverse enough in terms of experiences, expertise, and education to execute your business plan successfully. Make sure to detail your cofounders’ backgrounds and experiences in the deck, as well as how the company will benefit from each member’s involvement. The investors reviewed quite a few decks where the idea was strong, but there wasn’t enough information about backgrounds to determine if the team could pull it off. 2. DON’T downplay the competition Understanding what you’re up against will help you build a product that speaks to investors and customers. Know the competitive landscape and what it’s lacking, and make sure you have a competitive advantage to beat the competition at their own game. Further, don’t limit the scope to today’s competitors. You also need to think about future competition. Our judges saw many decks that reflected the current marketplace but didn’t explore the possibility of technologies like bots or 3-D printing taking over. Investors want to know you will be able to adapt to a rapidly changing landscape. 3. DON’T make promises you can’t keep Once you’ve compiled your document, review it multiple times, then have several others give you feedback. You should be on the lookout for exaggerations, miscalculations, and logistical incongruities. While it’s important to wow potential investors, this should not come at the cost of misrepresenting what you will achieve with the funding. Ask yourself: “If I had everything in place today, could I accomplish these goals?” If the answer is no, you’ll need to revise your plan and/or expected outcomes. 4. DON’T use a generic template Once you’ve figured out content, the final step is to craft a deck that shows off your idea. Strong branding will help you stand out in a sea of competition. Unless someone in the company has the ability to make a standard Microsoft PowerPoint template truly spectacular, you should consider hiring a graphic designer for a few hours to whip it into shape. Sites like Graphicriver and Slidecarnival are great places to find inspiration for designs. 4. DON’T include Clipart This should go without saying, but Clipart is dated. Including it in your deck will make investors think you are stuck in the 1990s. If you want to add a little flair to your presentation, find a designer on Behance or even Fivver (if you’re on a budget) who can create custom illustrations. Do your best to make it your own so you’ll stand out from the crowd. Good luck! Zz Twainy is Vice President of Roko Labs.
image url: 
http://1u88jj3r4db2x4txp44yqfj1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/startup-pitch-930x560.jpg

Vive La France! Vive Le Tech! …But Do These Two Great Tastes Taste Great Together?

$
0
0
I spent last week on a junket in Paris, paid for by the French government, visiting the various hubs and spokes of the burgeoning French startup scene. I don’t think they’ll invite me back, after they read this. My considered assessment is that the French government, and to an extent the larger French tech scene, lacks ambition, boldness, and confidence, and their technology strategy is doomed to failure. Among our many meetings was one with Axelle Lemaire, Minister of Digital Affairs for the (spectacularly unpopular) current French administration. She, personally, impressed me greatly; but her ministry’s policies did not. Their stated aim was to foster tech startups in France in order to support France’s largest companies. The idea is that the startup ecosystem will act as a kind of farm team, the best of which will be incorporated into the big businesses, to transform them into the kind of digital disruptors that can compete with the big American Internet companies. This is, to put it mildly, quixotic. It seems far more likely that big French companies will only slow and stifle whichever startups they partner, invest in, or acquire. This strategy stands in striking contrast to the Silicon Valley ethos that startups should devour and replace legacy dinosaurs, not prop them up. And it bespeaks a curious lack of ambition, as if the ultimate goal of any self-respecting tech startup is to become a division within LVMH or Total or Peugeot, rather than an Uber or Google or Tesla in their own right. Unfortunately, with a few exceptions, the French government’s attitude was echoed by most of the French companies, and incubators, and hubs, and conference planners, and venture capitalists, with whom we met. The general attitude was that startups were minor-league players competing to be acquired by big-league multinationals. Almost nobody thought big enough to imagine startups so successful that they changed all the rules of the game. Instead, almost everyone seemed to take it as a given that relationships and partnerships with big companies were, in and of themselves, extremely important and exciting. In fairness, the Valley makes a similar mistake when we celebrate funding rounds, rather than actual achievements — but still, can you imagine an early-stage AirBNB excitedly trumpeting a joint venture with Marriott, or a young Uber desperately seeking a partnership with Yellow Cab? This French attempt to turn Paris into a startup hub is admirable, but treating a startup ecosystem as an end in and of itself smacks of cargo-cultism, even if your intent is to harvest them for big-company talent. World-beaters do not grow in a petri dish of low ambitions; with the wrong messages and incentives, you risk accidentally pushing your best people and companies towards excellence elsewhere, leaving stagnant mediocrity behind. The good news is that, outside of the government, the French tech scene is decidedly in the middle of a sea change for the better. As a former Paris resident, I can assure you that the cultural attitude towards technology has been transformed. Ten years ago, tech was anything but cool. And we did encounter two extremely fast-growing French tech companies with admirably high and global ambitions, even if one of them — the long-distance ride-sharing platform BlaBlaCar — still claims, incomprehensibly, that the USA is not a good market for them. (The other is Sigfox, which I wrote about last week.) Another beacon of francophone hope is Xavier Niel, the multibillionaire who last decade singlehandedly overturned the government-approved order of things in the French mobile-phone industry. Neil has since created and continued to fund the genuinely revolutionary engineering school 42, a branch of which will soon open in California, and is now constructing a vast complex in Paris to house 1,000 startups. Yes, you read that correctly. And yes, that too sounds a little cargo-cult. But it’s also an example of the expansive ambition that the French —and European — tech scene badly needs.
image url: 
https://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/opera-garnier.jpg?w=738

The Global Town Square.

$
0
0
Disclosure: The images and designs in this post are in no way affiliated with Twitter Inc. This is simply a concept. *Pro tip: If the images are blurry, refresh the story. “We think of [Twitter] as the ‘global town square’…this notion of a very public, live, in-the-moment conversational platform.” — dick costolo, 2013 (former CEO of Twitter Inc.) I’ve always thought this was the perfect metaphor to describe the aspirations of Twitter. What do you think of when you hear the phrase “town square”? What kind of images does that phrase conjure up in your mind? I think of a small town from the 1700’s somewhere in colonial America filled with a group of townspeople. I think of the word “community”. I also can’t help to think of the word “noise”. I see these townspeople shouting amongst each other drowning out the voices of the collective. People are speaking but they are not being heard. Unless you’re Barack Obama, Drake, or some other notable figure in society, your voice is probably not being heard on Twitter today. Why? Community. Twitter is missing a sense of community. I believe this is the foundational problem with Twitter today and I aim to try to fix that with a concept design for a new product I call Twitter Rooms. Before we get into it, let’s see how Twitter works today… The difference between you and Kanye West. The crux of Twitter is a very simple broadcasting model. Every person on Twitter has a group of other people who follow them, and thus get access to that person’s tweets. They can choose to receive that tweet in almost real-time, or catch up on it at a later time in the future. Now some people have followers in the millions (Kanye West) and some people just have a few. This significantly influences your experience on Twitter. The less followers you have, the less incentive you have to actually Tweet…unless the people that follow you have some sort of significance in your life (i.e. family, friends, co-workers). I could probably write another whole article on why this is the case, but let’s just agree that for the average user, their family, friends, and co-workers don’t use Twitter to communicate with each other because they’re using some other service that starts with an F or something. I know that most of the people reading this are techies, so note that we’re speaking about regular people here. You are the exception, not the rule. But this is old news and a problem of yesteryear. Let’s speak about today… Today, Twitter is not a social network, it is an interest network (If Wall St. only understood that, they could stop comparing it to Facebook…but that will be the day). People seek out users who are aligned with their own personal interests. Joe Smith follows Kanye West because he is a hip-hop head, not because he has an actual relationship with Kanye outside of Twitter. Now take Joe Smith and multiply it by a couple of million and you have a model that looks similar to this: In this first graphic, Kanye West is a “Content Producer”. What’s a Content Producer? Exactly what you think they are. They(or it) produce(s) the mass of the content that spreads through Twitter. It doesn’t have to actually just be a person, it can also be a world event like an earthquake, or tonight’s episode of Game of Thrones. In this second graphic, the followers of the Content Producer begin to spread, or contribute to, the content they were seeded with. The problem is that most of the tweets from the followers end up going into the ether. Why? Because most people don’t have a strong following, so they end up going into the abyss of the Twitterverse to never see any real engagement. It’s like you’re in the town square and everyone is yelling over everyone else, so no one really gets heard or acknowledged for what they have to contribute. This is particularly damaging to the user experience of new users, as they are expecting the level of engagement from say a more intimate experience like Facebook, Snapchat, or Instagram. How can we fix this? How can we increase engagement amongst users without losing the character of Twitter? I believe the solution is through community. Breaking the ice. The hallmark of a great community is the quality of the conversation between the members of the community. It’s usually centered around the content that brings that community together. A conversation is one of the most engaging experiences you can have on Twitter…but it’s hard. There are two main reasons for this: The 140-character limit: It requires some substantial effort to edit your thoughts and package it up in 140-characters or less. Constructs like the “Tweetstorm” are a result of this. The [email protected]/* */ to yourself” tweet threading UI hack kind of helps…but it still hides all of the bread and butter of the conversation. Twitter’s UI is simply not compliant to conversations. Discovery: Where do I find a conversation? Right now, it’s a direct result of the people I follow. What happens if I’m a new user? Currently, Twitter surfaces me various recognizable users like celebrities and famous brands but they are producers, not engagers. If I tweet at them, they won’t respond. Twitter understands this, and Moments (their new product) is aimed to remedy that by giving you a parallel experience that’s more focused on the content than the actual people you follow. That’s a great first step but I wish there was a way to find more people like myself. I need to find the people from my tribe. The people who have similar interests to me. The people who would actually respond to what I have to say… Introducing Twitter Rooms. A Room is a place where you can chat with people, in real-time, about the things you love. It’s the idea of a chat room supercharged by the existing interest graph that people come to Twitter for today. Is cooking your passion? Great. It just so happens to be that the other 3 Million people who follow Jamie Oliver are super passionate about cooking as well. You should check out his Twitter Room called “The Kitchen” where you’ll meet other people who are just as crazy about herbs and spices as you are. Let’s revisit the graphic from before, but now with Rooms as a part of the Twitterverse: Compare and contrast this with the previous graphic. Do you see the difference? Instead of the followers just tweeting out into the ether, they now have a place where they can have a real conversation without the constraints of Twitter proper. At the same time, all of the potential engagement that was previously lost in the Twitterverse is now being supercharged and concentrated within a room. This is the goal of Rooms… The goal of Rooms is to infuse Twitter with real community. Now let’s see how Rooms can potentially look within the Twitter experience today… What used to be the Messages tab is now tucked away under the Me tab in exchange for the new shiny Rooms tab. There are three sections in the Rooms feed: Following: Much in the same way that I can follow a user, I can now follow Rooms to quickly get access to them in my feed, and maybe receive Tweets that might pertain to all members of that respective room. The rooms that you are following.2. Tailored: This will be a personalized feed of rooms that Twitter would recommend for you. It will look similar to the Following feed. 3. Popular: This will be a feed of the rooms that are the most popular on Twitter. The rooms that are popular.Now let’s check out some defining attributes of a Room: Anyone can start a room: It doesn’t matter if you’re Barack Obama, BuzzFeed, or Joe the Plumber, everyone has the option to create a room. No character limit: You are no longer sending tweets in a room. No more tweets? No more 140-character limit? Blasphemous! More on that later… Moderation: This is key. Although we’ve come a long way from the a/s/l days of AOL chatrooms the internet is still chock-full of trolls. There should be a combination of some self-policing amongst the respective members of a community with an option to report people & of course at least one moderator who has power to remove anyone from the room. The moderator will usually be the one who created the room. Does this mean the moderator needs to be present in the room at all times? Absolutely not. There could be an automatic system set up where people who get flagged “x” amount of times by others in the room get removed automatically. There should also be a limit on the amount of messages you can possibly send in say…a minute or two. Capacity: Rooms will have a capacity set by the moderator(s). You don’t want to have a situation where there are thousands of people in one room. Things can go haywire fast. I guess 1000 seems like a nice round number to draw the line at? Maybe even a bit too lax. Private or Public: You can have the option to start a private room where it’s off the grid. Say you’re part of the Illuminati and you wanted to make sure the room is invite only. You’re in luck! Rooms are secret-society friendly. Let’s go into one of my favorite rooms — The Meow Room from the good folks at Product Hunt. The key thing to note is that messages sent in the room are not considered tweets. Thus, there should not be a 140-character limit. In fact, you are actually able to share tweets in a room in the same manner that you are able to in Messages today. You are also able to share links and pretty much anything else that you can tweet today. But more importantly… Rooms is designed to shorten the learning curve of Twitter, while offering a familiar experience to the average user. and is especially great for new users for two reasons: Accessibility: This serves as a great way for new users to jump into the conversation on Twitter in a manner that’s easy to understand. There’s no need to tweet. Everyone with an iPhone knows how messaging works. The learning curve is virtually non-existent. Networking: Instead of just following the popular accounts on Twitter that never engage with you, you are instead introduced to actual real people that have similar interests to you. Mostly everyone agrees that one of the most difficult things to do on Twitter is finding the right people to follow while constantly curating that list. Rooms aims to short-circuit that process. It jumpstarts you into a network that would otherwise require massive amounts of time and energy to figure out as a new user just by simply offering a gathering place for people with similar interests. I believe this has the potential to be a game changer for the experience of a new user by laying the foundation to ease them into the core Twitter experience of actually tweeting. They will now have someone to actually tweet at. Dat Potential. I was recently wondering why techies like myself particularly love Twitter. We use it enthusiastically and are often the first ones to point out a flaw in whatever Twitter is doing wrong on any given day… I think we do it because we see the power and potential of Twitter and want the rest of the world to see it as well. Many of us formed friendships, jumpstarted our careers, and raised a million dollars off of one of Bored Elon Musk’s tweets. But why do we love it? I think it’s because we have a robust and thriving community. I’ll be the first to tell you that I’m not sure if this exact proposal will work. It is merely just a concept and probably flawed in many ways. However, what I’m 100% sure of is that whether it’s through a product similar to Rooms or something completely different, Twitter needs to put the idea of community front and center. Community needs to be infused into the experience of Twitter. It is the missing piece of the puzzle. Who am I? I’m an engineering-minded product designer and a design-minded iOS engineer from New York City. I also happen to be looking to join a team of passionate people to work on some great products. If that interests you, lets chat: [email protected]/* */ or @danielrakh If you enjoyed this article you would enjoy these as well! UberGENIUSA product design proposal for Uber.medium.com Redesigning Twitter MomentsA concept design study reimagining Twitter’s newest feature.medium.com Introducing the Tweetstorm ™Designing the emerging tweeting style into Twitter.medium.com
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1200/1*ncc-l-v7xhUw-htbGHnCdg@2x.png

Back To The Future For A Positive Scottish Media Alternative — Medium

$
0
0
Thanks Dad: back to the future for a positive Scottish media alternative Flashback: it’s 60 years ago, and a keen young journalist, who’s getting used to the big city ways of Aberdeen after moving from Buckie, a small port on the north-east of Scotland, wins a national prize for a thesis on the UK fishing industry, submitted as part of his training. It’s a detailed piece of work, based on the type of interviewing and statistical analysis he later becomes renowned for in a career covering sport, mainly football, including four World Cups, and Aberdeen FC reigning supreme under Alex Ferguson. Throughout this working life, the journalist is part of a Scottish media that thrives. In the words of Roy Thomson, owning an ITV franchise is “a licence to print money” and the newspaper barons also revel in circulations that total millions. Scots, famously, consume more papers per capita than any other country in the world and the revenue swilling around the system means lavish staffing, with equally lavish salaries and expenses for employees. And still lavish profits for the owners. It’s the heyday of Scottish journalism, and the young sports writer is in his element. In the 1970s, he takes his son to many football matches, where the teenager is sent to run and phone copy from remote landlines to head office, and the vocation is handed down another generation. Thanks Dad. Flash forward: it’s 2016, and everything has changed. The sports writer has died (at the good age of 85) and the son finds himself — like so many others — too old/expensive for a legacy print industry which is in spiralling decline, collectively bemused by the digital revolution. Titles are closing, remaining circulations are collapsing by around 10% every year, staff numbers are being slashed, and the only responses are widespread rationalisation, centralisation, and so-called synergies which — logically — can prolong the industry for only a finite time before it disappears into oblivion. How to respond? Nostalgic memories? Bitterness? Resignation? All those emotions would be valid if you believe that Scotland has fundamentally changed, and no longer needs the written media it once consumed so voraciously. But if you think that Scots still treasure information, care about our community (at home and abroad), and value a shared national identity which has coped with political and financial earthquakes, maybe there’s another approach. Which is where the son, with a bit of help from his Dad, starts afresh. A solution in solutions journalism: it’s a well documented fact that the UK follows after many American trends — think music, TV, food. It’s also fairly obvious that, in a digital universe, the time lag has got shorter: if the gap was once five years, it’s now probably down to one, or less. Across the Atlantic, some of the most successful and prestigious publications have already embraced solutions or constructive journalism — see “What’s Working” in HuffPo, “Fixes” in the New York Times, and “Take Action” in the Christian Science Monitor. All start from a belief that much of the modern digital audience is regularly switched off by the mainstream media agenda of disaster, conflict, political knockabout, and celebrity clickbait. They vote with their cursors and shun articles that leave them bored, unfulfilled or even depressed. But give them a chance to engage with an uplifting story, to be inspired by an ordinary person’s solution to a problem, and they’ll both read and share it. They do it all the time on Facebook, on such online platforms with massive audiences as Upworthy and Humans of New York. Ironically, it sounds a bit like what helped power Scotland’s media back in the day, six decades ago. Positively Scottish: so why we don’t harness the Scottish USP to an agenda of solutions journalism, and see if there’s an audience for that? Not instead of the main media players, who still cover hard news pretty well if a major story breaks, but as a daily option for people who want to read about how ordinary fellow citizens are dealing with change and adversity, and be inspired and enthused. Since the print business model is all but doomed, it has to be online only, which also means it can easily reach readers in all parts of Scotland, and the vast Scottish diaspora who still cherish news of their homeland. (We reckon Positively Scottish will be one of the first sites in the world to marry solutions journalism with a national/regional USP.) It should be free, for maximum access, and run as a not-for-profit, since good, useful journalism ought to be a social value, not just a commercial commodity. It’ll start small, as an online magazine with a guarantee of at least one new story six days a week. Its growth will be linked to funding received — all new money will be re-invested in more stories. Who’ll write the articles? Well, there’s no shortage of talented journalists out there, including the hundreds of youngsters who complete university degree training every year and whose only viable career path seems now to lie in PR. We’ve no plans for an office: us old hacks know that you find real stories by meeting people in the community, not churning endless press releases at your keyboard. And, crucially, who’ll pay for the project? Tricky, since it’s a new thing, and digital ads really don’t work, especially in an age of adblockers. But surely organisations with a social mission would welcome an editorial partnership with a website which can demonstrate a niche but growing readership, committed to positive values? Then there’s the possibility of philanthropic or grant aid for robust journalism with a community benefit, not to mention individual supporters who can afford to help maintain something that brings daily positivity. But it needs start-up funding: Even before the dementia kicked in, Dad was too old school to understand digital. A basic mobile phone was deemed pointless by him, to his family’s frustration. However, he would definitely have approved of something which offered real work opportunities to journalists, especially the younger generation who’ll miss out on the sort of workplace training readily on offer to him (and his son). So it seems entirely proper that Positively Scottish launches thanks to a legacy created by part of my share of his will. That allows the site to be funded through its proof-of-concept phase, with a view to attracting external finance and eventually becoming self-sustaining. More funding will mean more journalism, more readers, and more work opportunities. Thanks Dad. http://positivelyscottish.scot/ has been set up through seed funding from the Alastair Gordon Macdonald legacy. The not-for-profit organisation’s founding directors include Calum Macdonald, aged 54 and a half, a former digital editor of the Herald & Times Group in Glasgow. HTs to @joshstearns @molly d’aguilar and the team at the Geraldine Dodge Foundation in New Jersey and Jeff Jarvis @buzzmachine for some of the radical thoughts behind this project. You know what to do if you like this article…more importantly, come and read all the articles on http://positivelyscottish.scot/ !!
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*Qznq9qbDHHyABtpq1kphKA.jpeg

Why It Is Nearly Impossible To Build An Award Website From Scratch Alone

$
0
0
The technology is growing day by day and things changes extremely quickly. Nowadays building an awesome website from scratch is far more complex then it used to be 10 years ago, so the next time you open your browser and start judging the persons that build the website, or point that you can build everything alone, think twice. Introduction This short article is a thought, followed by some hypothesis that are not based on science. We will focus more on the Fronte-End part, which is usually the part more visible and the part that most websites are judge for. For an award website is meant all those sites that win awards such as the Webby Awards or Awwward, these websites are custom and unique. Let’s make an example: http://www.navigatingresponsibly.dk http://www.nowyouseeme.movieThose two website examples are award winning websites on Awwwards at the time this article is written (may 2016). The above websites will be used as examples throw the article. Note that technology and trends are evolving very quickly, what is considered an award website our days will probably not be within few years from now. The key message to leave with is that building those websites alone is far a reality. Why it is so hard Not so far, time ago, there was no VR, no WebGL in the browser, no CSS and SVG animations, nor so large bandwidth, no wearables and smartphones, no websites build entirely on JavaScript, no retina display. It used to be a lot easier building a website, there were few browsers, fewer things to think about, you needed fewer skills. You may argue about the old Internet Explorer rendering the life a little bit harder, and Flash letting you create rich and interactive websites, but even that you had fewer things to worry about. The average website used to be more CSS & HTML, they were simpler, less interactive. As today, things changed, we see daily super interactive websites, with VR, real-time 3D (WebGL), rich SVG and CSS animations and adaptable to all kind of screen sizes. You may look at one of these award winning websites, and ask yourself, why my website isn’t so cool, why my developer can’t build a website like this, or worst, you may be convinced that you will be able to build everything by your own. The fact is that nowadays it’s nearly impossible to build alone an website from scratch, It was true time ago. Let’s assume you already have the back-end software, an WordPress installation or any other software, that will ease a lot your life, now let’s focus on the front-end part. As introduced before, ourdays we have huge, bold and rich interactive user experience websites. Let’s assume we wanna build one of these award winning websites by our own, below is listed a checklist and the skills you should have: Art Direction (Creativity & the idea) Graphic Design (Illustrator or whatever) HTML5 & CSS3 for the template cross-browser testing SEO Copywriting 3D and VR (WebGL) JavaScript GIT Bower, Gulp, NPM, SASS, LESS … Web Semantics (OpenGraph, Microdata …) … As you can see that list is huge, there are a lot of things you should be good at. You may try to do everything by your own, but the fact is that it’s more likely you’ll leverage those skills, but you will never be a master in all these areas at once. Focus and become a master in one area. These award winning websites are build by a group of very specialised people, a typical team may be composed by a Project Manager, Graphic Designer, Front-End developer, Back-End developer, Marketing (SEO, Social Media) and the Copywrite guy. Do you still think you can do the job of all these people at once? It is difficult to be a generalist. Conclusion To wrap-up what was said so far I would like to summarise and give you some ideas and thinks to leave with. First: the next time you look at an website, don’t start judging, don’t get angry, be humble, try to understand what is you don’t like, what are the things that don’t work, then get in touch with who’ve build the website and let them know, building an website is not so easy these days. Second: if you still think you can build an award winning website alone go ahead and please go above at the beginning and read again, al those cool websites require a lot of time, creativity and skills, which you are more likely to leverage, but still It’s nearly impossible to be a master in all those areas. Third: if you build websites, get good at one thing, focus on one thing, don’t be a generalist, Fourth and the most important thinks is that if you want to build an awesome website you need to find a great team to build thinks with, grow together, it is still hard, it will take a lot time and energy but it is far more realistic to build an award winning website.
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*kO46uxBz1RLsbIiwrwRHWQ.jpeg

My 9 Rules For Building Viable Startups: Advice From A Startup studio

$
0
0
Image Credit: everything possible / Shutterstock Startup studios are a relatively new type of business. You might have heard of them before as “venture builders” or “startup factories.” There are only a dozen or so of them in the world, including the original one, IdeaLab, and others like Expa and BetaWorks. But I believe we’ll see more and more of them in the future because the model works. The people behind these organizations are seasoned entrepreneurs, investors, and makers. They don’t get pitches, there is no Demo Day, and they don’t make investments in external companies. For the most part, ideas are in-house, built from scratch to validate a business idea and spin it off as an independent startup, with the studio retaining a portion of the equity. When the startup studio I work with, Pioneer Square Labs, started — just nine months ago —  there wasn’t a lot of open knowledge to draw from on how to run this kind of business. It’s similar to when Y Combinator and TechStars got started and the accelerator model wasn’t well understood. Many variations on the accelerator model have since been tried  —  some have failed, some have succeeded  —  and there is a body of information and expertise out there for the next entrepreneur trying to create an accelerator. So I wanted to share some key lessons we’ve learned so far about running a startup studio. Of the many lessons we’ve gleaned so far, I’ve chosen the following nine because they are easy to articulate and don’t feel obvious (that’s a dangerous statement since most of these will sound obvious after you read them, but when you are in the trenches executing a business, not everything is so clear). 1.  Research goes a long way I won’t go into our ideation process, but I can tell that it’s not uncommon for someone to propose an idea and then find that there are already three companies executing it. If you find no companies doing your idea already, you have to ask why and dig for data. Many times there are regulations that will block your idea, or, worst-case scenario, there is no money to be made. However, that’s researching with the intent of not doing it, and one of the reasons big companies have a hard time innovating is because  most arrows point to no. Sometimes, the best research yields a much better idea that hasn’t been done yet, or it reveals the money or interest is with entity X and not Y as expected, and that the industry in question hasn’t innovated in a long time. That’s the jackpot! 2. Stay close to the money If I were to print a T-shirt in honor of Greg Gottesman, it would say, “Stay close to money.” What that means is, be part of the financial transaction, be the business taking the credit card number, or be the business delivering the core value to the customer. Yes, some big businesses were built far from the money, like Facebook. But a startup studio doesn’t have the luxury of one-off hits or the time to prove demand for a product where the core metrics are long-term engagement and virality. Being close to the financial transaction makes it easy to prove or disprove a business. 3.  Unsexy ideas get validated more quickly I’d like to posit that the “sexiness” of an idea is inversely correlated to its chances of success. Why does this correlation exist? Just like with human beings, where the sexual attraction between two people can cloud their judgment, ideas that feel sexy sometimes cloud our decision on whether or not to pursue them. “Sexy,” of course, is in the eye of the beholder. You might be lured in by an industry you find exciting (like travel, so you drive off the cliff of the travel industry), or a technology (bitcoin or chatbots), or by a person who has had significant success singing the merits of a new idea. All those things can affect good judgment. On the other hand, when you look into an idea in a non-sexy industry (healthcare, banking, insurance), or that uses just conventional technology, and where there is no billionaire singing its praise, if most people on your team agree it feels worth pursuing, then you can be confident it’s worth pursuing. 4. Look for a collision of ideas The best ideas don’t come out of the blue and hit you in the head with a Eureka moment. Some philosophers believe there are no new ideas, and all ideas are just a combination of previous ideas. And that’s where things get interesting. The best idea is usually a combination of previous ideas, an evolution of another idea, or an already successful idea applied to a different domain. Which brings me to the point I want to make: The only way to have great ideas is to play with and explore a lot of ideas. For a little inspiration, watch Steven Johnson’s video. 5.  Average sucks Imagine you and your team are rating two ideas. Each person gives a score of 1–5 (1 being awful and 5 being great). Which idea is best: idea A with an average of 3.2 or idea B with an average of 3.5? You just don’t know. The aim is not to find consensus but to find ideas that resonate with a good portion of the team. If everyone gave idea B a 3.5 but for idea A you had a few people give it a 5, a few give a 3, and a few give it a 2, idea A is the better one to test. So the goal is not to convince everyone an idea is good or even find an idea that clears an arbitrary average threshold but to find an idea where a few people would have the motivation to explore it (more on that in #7 below). 6.  Diversity is king (and queen) It would be very hard for someone living in isolation in the middle of a forest to come up with an idea for a product that people want. Not as extreme, but in a similar vein, it’s going to be hard for a roomful of white dudes in their mid-30s, who all went to the same college, live in the same city, and have the same problems to come up with a product that solves a problem for people who don’t match their profile. If you agree with my point #4 above — that good ideas come from the collision of other ideas — it’s easy to see why diversity in thinking, background, and experiences is the best source of raw idea-material. Gender diversity is important, but so are all other dimensions of diversity, including life experiences, age, religion, political views, background, etc. 7.  Uncommitted, but passionate A few months ago I wrote about the analogy between a romantic relationship and building a startup and said that, like choosing a spouse, choosing a startup idea should only be done after an extensive period of low-level engagement (dating). This low-level of commitment is especially important in the early days. You don’t want to fall in love with an idea that prevents you from seeing its flaws. You want to feel a great desire to understand the idea without making a full commitment to it. The “un-commitment” is also the number one reason I believe some people cannot work at a startup studio. It’s unsettling how quickly things can change on an idea you are pursuing. Maybe a critical distribution partner decides they won’t partner anymore. Maybe a key domain expert who was the driver behind an initiative suddenly decides to pursue a corporate job. Maybe a piece of technology that was assumed would take a few weeks to build turns out to be a six-month effort and won’t fit into the startup studio model. Too many things can go wrong, so, hard as it may be, you have to be able to keep the relationship at arms-length. 8.  ABR Always be recruiting. It’s surprising how quickly things can go from 5 to zero or from 5 to 10. This month you might be killing a project, and next month you may have a new spin-off just waiting for the right CEO + CTO team. The only solution we’ve found to this so far is not to wait until things are ready before engaging potential CEOs and CTOs, knowing well that the effort might not lead anywhere (on either side). 9.  Entrepreneurs ∩ idea people = small set If there is one thing I’d like you to take away from this post it is this point: We mistakenly assume that good entrepreneurs are good creators (idea people). The media bombards us with this love story of how one night someone had a magical “a-ha” moment, founded a startup, became a fantastic leader, and a few years later were a billionaire. It’s a myth on top of another myth. Ray Krok didn’t found McDonald’s. Howard Schultz didn’t found Starbucks. Elon Musk didn’t found Tesla! Get over it. It’s fine. A lot of exceptional entrepreneurs  —  even ones who have been successful in the past  —  struggle to find great ideas to pursue. A lot of them don’t feel the need to be there on the day of inception, but they develop a passion for someone else’s idea and have a mental plan of how to take it from point B to point Z. And we know that it’s not the idea but the execution that matters. Marcelo Calbucci is a Seattle-based serial-entrepreneur who leads startup-building at Pioneer Square Labs. You can follow him on Twitter @calbucci.
image url: 
http://1u88jj3r4db2x4txp44yqfj1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/strategy-930x620.jpg

Sadbottrue.com Has Found 18,000,000 Botnet In Twitter

$
0
0
The true story For the pure experiment, Sadbottrue.com team creates a new account the sarcastic cashout trainer @investjtravolta with social media skeptic content. For the experiment, we bought 6500 followers from the Fiverr seller Bruchlay. Costs were as low as $5 and processing fee. Now Bruchlay deletes his account. Three days after purchase, the followers number skyrocketing to 6500 mark. According to STAQ methodology Socialpuncher.com, 94% are non-active primitive bots-followers. The facts about different sorts of bots can be found in chapter 4. Obviously, these fakes follow not only @InvestJTravolta. For every bot, we downloaded the set of its friends and then build bot`s social graph. We found different twitter accounts, many sites and a lot of gigs on fiverr.com where anyone can buy bots. If you are not close to industry and you want to grow your followers count, you probably will get it from this botnet. We estimate this botnet in 15,000,000 twitter accounts.This is not a single botnet, it is the complex network with several centers that receive and distribute orders. This is the largest non-dedicated botnet in Twitter. In addition, we found 3,000,000 twitter bot accountsfrom other botnets. That is an evidence, that among active Twitter users are 18,000,000 bots This is not just a figure, all of them are known by name and ID. Whole New York where an every citizen in offices, cars, parks, and the subway is full of dummies. The 7 botnet facts 1,300,000 have no location, description, followers, tweets at all. 3,090,000 have no followers. 4,390,000 have no tweets. 9,450,000 accounts have less or equal 10 tweets. 10,100,000 have no description. 10,240,000 bots have 20 times friends more than followers. 13,630,000 bots have 5 times friends more than followers. There are definitely dead bots for just following. The lowest price for 1M followers is about $ 400. The US part of botnet associated with @InvestJTravolta has total about 100M followers, it cost in wholesale minimum $ 40,000. In retail, it would cost about $ 100,000. Count of the fake followers sold worldwide is more than 1 billion combined. That means, accumulated earnings of the botnet is more $1,000,000 (for clients “account with more 90% bot-followers”). Top 7 accounts With more than 90% primitive bots among followers.The screenshots. 1. Angel Rivera @Angelluisr (Verified) 2. Rick Rosner @dumbassgenius (sad, but true). 3. Filippa Linrooos @FilippaLinrooos (It is a bot) 4. David Copperfield @D_copperfield (Verified) 5. King James @LeBronJames (The parody account) 6. Alejandro Vigilante @VigilanteArtist 7. DR JAMES CABOT @DRJAMESCABOT (it is a pro-Trump cyborg) You can read more about top 7 accounts in chapter Chapter 5. 7 wonders of Twitter If you want more accounts with more 1,000,000 bot-followers. We have the story about 23 accounts, which can cause depression, mental disorder and temporary memory loss. Chapter 6. The vanity fear. Read only people not suffering from phobias and panic attacks, resistant to hard stress. All of them are members of Twitter Top 1000. The next 23 accounts in top-100 bot buyers have more than 1,000,000 followers. Some of those accounts have less than 10 tweets. One of them sells bots for all kind of social media, read about its price comparison with Fiverr.com in chapter 7. Among top-100 bot buyers, we found accounts related with celebrities, mass media, advertising, social media, and political PACs. The only bot buyer told about it, is stand-up comic Joe Mande with 1,000,000 fake followers. We analyzed his audience and concluded, it is the same botnet. Chapter 8. The 1 million stand-up bots The sad answers 1. There is 15M botnet of fake followers in Twitter for thousand buyers. 2. The estimation of the open market of fake followers in Twitter is more $1M and 1 billion in the count of sales. 3. This is the largest non-dedicated botnet in Twitter. According to context analysis, those bots have trash sense graph. The first Top-100 bot buyers dataset. About Bots, clicking on advertising have stolen $8,000,000,000. And in our opinion, bots have stolen much more, because $8,000,000,000 we have already found. www.sabottrue.com is the non-political team fighting against the social media fraud ecosystem. We are not affiliated with any of the candidates.Views are our own. Team Sadbottrue.com wrote social media fraud investigations about politics and business.The every chapter is a new investigation.
image url: 
https://cdn-images-2.medium.com/max/800/1*VlXQ6AMPO3KS8owxbNJXPA.png

How Businesses And Recruiters Are Using Snapchat To Hire Young People

$
0
0
Snapchat is one of the most popular mobile apps in 2016 that allows users to send videos and pictures which is also a good avenue for Snapchat recruiters to hire goal driven and dynamic young individuals. Snapchat is a fun messaging app also. Photography or video can be taken by you, then put in a caption or lens graphic over top and then shared with a friend. Alternatively, you can include it to your story, a 24-hour collection of your photographs and videos, which you broadcast to the world or even to your followers. Snapchat is exclusive for the reason that all photographs and videos only last a brief timeframe before they fade away permanently, making the phone app short-lived in character, though a screenshot of the snaps can be made to save lots of them in picture form. By May 2014, Snapchat app’s users were sending 700 million snaps every day. Snapchat can be used to send videos and photographs — called snaps — to friends. Friends and family can view the snaps for 10 seconds. Some people can’t believe why someone would really need to send quick pictures or videos to friends, particularly if they cannot be preserved for later viewing. Well, these snaps can be saved. Can Snapchat be used for Recruitment? The answer to that question is determined by your audience. Knowing your prospective audience is important in virtually any Snapchat recruitment effort. It is a fact that 71% of Snapchat users are under 25 years old or between the ages of 18–30. Therefore, entry-level graduates fall into this category alongside college students and those also starting employment for the first time. If you are looking to target younger employees, creative types, marketing professionals, IT programmers, social media executives etc, Snapchat is worthy of consideration given the age of users it is attracting. Snapchat is a superb exemplary case of a non-traditional application that’s not only fun and possible for applicants to make use of, but is also a great approach to examining a candidate’s communication skills in a manner that a resume alone cannot do. A Snapchat story can be images or brief videos that are visible for 24 hours unless saved, providing a far more lasting, long-lasting feel to the short-lived Snaps you likely send to your friends and relations. This is a free of charge and effective method for companies to market themselves. Sharing a URL to a careers page allows interested individuals to screenshot the image and use as a reference for internet browsing later. Advertising on Snapchat Businesses can also make use of Snapchat paid advertising across specific stories. To advertise, you simply create a still image or video advertisement and get interested users to publish stories that are relevant to your niche or category. Recruiters can also increase their brand visibility with photos and videos of the organization and team member profiles. Lastly, the following Industry categories appear to be utilizing Snapchat’s advertising platform for hiring and other business reasons ~Marketing/Advertising ~Education ~Sports ~Entertainment ~Food/Beverage ~Fashion ~Technology
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*H3Yq_sICHBuWid30IMGsBw.jpeg

How Fintech Startups Should Engage Finserv Incumbents

$
0
0
If my thesis on the growing importance of Corporate Venture Capital, b2b business models and finserv (banking or insurance) Incumbents as strategic partners for fintech startups — in lending, capital markets, payments, asset management and insurance — then it is of the utmost importance for said startups to know how to engage with their future investors/customers/partners. To be clear, for the purposes of this exercise I will assume there is a business/technology rationale and intent to partner. The most optimal way to know how to engage with someone is to learn how they engage with you. A finserv Incumbent will engage you along three vectors: a) the venture investing vector, b) the innovation vector, and c) the business vector. Answering questions around what, how, who and where along these three vectors is paramount to your future success. Answers to many of the questions I am mapping out below will help you gauge not only the mechanics of engagement but the culture of the strategic partner you are dealing with and if that culture fits with your vision. Your goal is to figure out how difficult the road ahead is and what to do to maximize success. Remember that dealing with a finserv Incumbent is eminently more difficult that dealing with an independent venture investor. As a rule of thumb the more abstracted, specialized and sophisticated each of these vectors are, the easier it will be to achieve your goals, assuming business alignment and intent are present. Picture a finserv Incumbent where there is no venture or innovation team per se and where all decision will be made on balance sheet by business leaders with little understanding of early stage technology or business models and you will readily understand that your path will be rather arduous. Here are a few pointers I recommend fintech entrepreneurs pay heed to when interacting with a bank or an insurance company. Answering these questions will lead you to better understand what beast you are dealing with. 1) How does an Incumbent invest in startups: Does the group you are dealing with have a dedicated team specialized in venture investing or a generalist team that takes care of any type of investment? Is the venture team investing on balance sheet or are they organized as a separate entity? How much capital is dedicated to venture investing? Who sits on the Investment Committee, only the venture team, only executives, a mix? What can they invest in and what cannot they invest in? What makes them consider making an investment? Can they invest without a commercial or strategic rationale? 2) How mature is an Incumbent’s venture investing practice: How many investments have they made? What is their due diligence and investment process? How long does it take? How deep is the due diligence process? How much capital is left to make investments in the next 3 years? What is their reputation? Are they specialized enough to know venture investing is as much of an art as it is a science, if not more? 3) How does an Incumbent approach innovation: Do they have an innovation group? Is it centralized or decentralized — especially important if you are dealing with a global incumbent? In case there is a central innovation group and decentralized teams, who is the decision maker when considering innovation projects? Is the innovation group divided into specialized teams? 4) How mature is an Incumbent’s innovation group: How long has the group been in existence? How many projects has the group worked on? How many projects can the group work on simultaneously? Does the group work on projects with early stage startups as well as established service providers? How savvy are they with your technology? What is their reputation in the marketplace? Are they leaders, “me too” players? 5) What is the role of the business group involved: Do they have decision making powers when contemplating an investment, when contemplating a commercial agreement? When do they get involved — early in the process, late? Can they contemplate a commercial agreement without making an investment? 6) How mature are the Incumbent’s business groups when dealing with startups: How many startups have they dealt with? How many commercial agreements have they completed? Where they front line or did they rely on Venture and Innovation? What is their reputation? What is the average time for them to go to market with new projects? How is their incentive, top line or cost wise, with your particular business? Are they urgently in need of your business solution? 7) Interaction between Venture, Innovation and the Business groups: Who leads, who follows, who reports to whom? Is the interest in interacting with your startup initiated by Innovation, by Venture, by the Business group and what are the implications? How will Venture or Innovation help you navigating potential commercial agreements with Business groups? Who has “skin in the game” compared to the others? Who has more “skin in the game” than others? 8) How is the decision making process influenced: Who are the decision makers, the gatekeepers and the champions? Where do they sit in the org chart and among the Venture, Innovation and Business groups. 9) Motivations of each of Venture, Innovation and Business groups: Are the motivations aligned? What are the goals? Pay special attention to how aligned the Business group is with Venture and Innovation. Do commercial imperatives trump innovation imperatives? Do long term strategic imperatives trump short term commercial ones? How do these motivations and imperatives apply to you and your startup? 10) Reporting Structure: Who do Venture and Innovation report to? Directly to the CEO, the CFO, the Board? If not who do they report to? Does Venture report to Innovation? Are both Venture and Innovation hidden within the bowels of an Incumbent or do they have the necessary and required exposure and support from C-level executives? 11) Explore the role of legal, compliance and regulatory: How convoluted will be the legal and compliance process? Will you be dealing directly with legal and compliance or will you be shielded by Venture, Innovation of the Business group? When will legal and compliance be involved? Are they well versed in the legal arts of early stage investing? Will they bring a bazooka to a knife fight? How much of a burden will they impose on you? Will there be a regulatory approval hurdle to clear? 12) Explore the role of procurement: Assuming there is a vendor management or procurement group, will you need to clear that hurdle too? What will it mean to you, how many resources will you have to engage immediately and over time? What type of data will you need to provide? Are they gatekeepers or decision makers too? 13) Explore who will be in charge of a commercial project implementation and integration: Will the Business group be responsible? Will they have the skills and understanding required to fully digest your technology and business model? Will they rely on a separate IT or operations group? If so, how does the IT/Ops group interact with new vendors when implementing and integrating? How mature and sophisticated is the IT/Ops team? Have they engaged startups in the past or are they more of a “we build our own stuff” outfit? 14) Explore how your future finserv Incumbent partner interacts with the broad ecosystem: Are they aligned with independent hackathons, independent accelerators? Who are their natural peer partners — other banks or insurers they have invested with in the future or entered in JV or commercial agreements with? Who are their natural competitors — those they will not want to deal with or invest with or JV with? Which traditional VC investors have they invested with in the past? Which non-bank companies do they partner with? Does partnering accelerate your chances of additional partnerships? 15) Gauge how you will need to adapt: Inevitably, you will need to adapt based on answers and observations you glean along the way. I do not mean adapting in fundamental ways such as radically changing your business model or your technology, and if that is a requirement then you should think twice about the costs and benefits before engaging fully. Rather I mean marginal adaptation to clear certain understandable hurdles around technology delivery for example. How much professional services will you need to incorporate? Will you need to localize to a certain geography? Will your partner’s compliance thresholds lead you to tweak your technology? The sooner you get clarity on the need to adapt and how you will need to adapt, the sooner you will be able to quantify and qualify the associated costs. 16) Explore post integration life as a startup partner: Are the rules of engagement well defined? Will there be periodic reviews? How will you be reviewed? Will the relationship be balanced? Who will participate? Will the champions, gatekeepers and decision makers that you identified during the pre commercial phase be the same? I realize I have mapped many questions. My purpose is not to scare a fintech entrepreneur. Do realize the end goal is a potential prize of investment, referenceable client, commercial agreement and cash flow generation. In other words, the rewards are overwhelmingly worth the pain of discovery and engagement strategy building. Additionally, even if there is a demonstrable strategic/commercial rationale, answer to the above may lead you to realize you are not ready for that particular finserv Incumbent as a partner, or that they are not ready for you. That type of epiphany may save you form serious heartburns down the road. More specifically, dealing with a finserv Incumbent is unique from the point of view of regulatory, compliance and legal complexities as well as the type of individuals you will encounter (business leaders may not know how to engage with a startup, IT/Ops may not be up to par knowledge wise). Knowledge will allow you to mitigate more effectively. Finally, remember that the mature service providers and vendors that sell to banks or insurers are very sophisticated and know how to sell, to whom to sell, how complex it is to sell. As a fintech entrepreneur you are competing with these mature service providers with limited resources. You need the smarts and the framework to close that gap and become a sophisticated “enterprise” focused fintech startup in your own right. Originally published at finiculture.com.
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/0*1wDGr9SmZBPbD3R4.jpg

Google: The Paradox Of Plenty In Tech

$
0
0
The paradox of plenty refers to when the abundance of resources that a country has acts as a curse, leading to lower economic growth for a number of reasons — think of the oil-rich countries that have very low growth and major instability. As both a political science major and the CTO of a tech startup, I found the paradox of plenty to be very applicable to Google, a company that has frustrated me for a long time. Search provides Google with “plenty” Search catapulted Google to becoming the most valuable company in the world. It allows them to make massive investments, allows them to maintain a cash balance larger than the GDPs of hundreds of countries, and what funds the free gourmet meals, amazing perks, and beautiful offices that they provide their employees with. However, Google’s abundance of resources as a result of search have, conversely, led the company to become complacent and fail to innovate in a number of areas where it should have been the hands-down market leader. The paradox: Google’s inability to execute and capitalize on opportunities In almost every area of innovation over the past few years, Google had a competitive advantage, yet failed to capitalize on it due to poor execution. Chat One of the most inspirational stories coming from Silicon Valley is the story of WhatsApp. Jan Koum, who once collected food stamps, built a company that was acquired for $19 billion in just a few short years with a small team of engineers. WeChat, a China-based chat company, now has close to 700 million active users and drives billions of dollars of commerce. LINE, the dominant chat app in Japan and Korea has 215 million active users and generated $225 million in revenue in one quarter in 2015. Facebook, seeing that chat was the next new frontier, developed Facebook Messenger, which has now become the second most popular chat application in the world (behind WhatsApp). WhatsApp really became big in 2011 (though it launched in 2009). WeChat launched in 2011. LINE launched in 2011. Facebook Messenger launched in 2011. Google launched Google Talk (unofficially known as GChat)in 2006. Google had the network of users (through their integration with Gmail and through all their other apps), they had the technology (chat as a core technology hasn’t changed all that much), and most importantly, they had a 5-year head start. To this day, GChat hasn’t evolved at all — it lacks any advanced features and is relatively hard to use. It is now an all but dead annoying side-panel in my Gmail that I minimize out of my view. Though Google had everything going for them, Google failed to capitalize on this opportunity to dominate chat. Social Again, the dominance of Gmail provided Google with a network of millions of users. In fact, Gmail currently has over 900 million users on its platform, which easily dwarfs its other direct competitors. Rather than leveraging this network effectively, Google first made a foray into social with Orkut (which they built after not being able to acquire Friendster). Orkut actually launched a month before Facebook did and was, in fact, the second largest social media network behind MySpace in 2006. However, when Facebook came on the stage and became widely available, it quickly became clear that it was the better option for developing a network. With Orkut, Google built a platform that didn’t meet it’s user’s needs when building communities. Orkut consisted of two features, 1) a chat feature that didn’t work well nor served much of a purpose the way it was designed and 2) a “wall” feature for communities where anyone could join (think of this as public Facebook Pages). The more people that joined Orkut, the more people joined these communities and started posting, which actually diluted the communities and made them cluttered with bad and offensive content. “Network effects” make platforms more valuable and “sticky” as more people join. Google’s poor execution and inability to pivot resulted in inverse network effects — Orkut became less valuable as more people joined. Google was forced to shut Orkut down. However, Google gave social another shot and built Google Plus. Google again failed here from an execution standpoint because it forced its users of other services to sign up for the platform, angering many of them. In another executional blunder, the Google Plus user experience was nowhere near as seamless as Facebook’s — it was confusing and hard to use. Google was forced to admit defeat again and shut down the service in 2015 (though fragments of it still remain). Augmented Reality / Virtual Reality Augmented reality and virtual reality are one of the hottest topics in the tech world these days. Google Glass is the perfect example of the company’s failure to execute in this space. Google Glass was my first introduction to AR/VR back in 2013 — I remember putting the glasses on and being very excited about all the potential the they had to change the world. Fast-forward 2 years and the project was shut down because Google built it in a way where it didn’t do anything especially well — it was very basic and only allowed people to check their emails and texts (successful platforms tend to “seed” their platforms with great apps), looked ugly and obnoxious (the term “Glassholes” was coined for people who wore Google Glasses), and had a very short 3-hour battery life. Again, Google failed when it came down to execution. Just as in social, Google is not giving up yet in this space. Google has released its own VR development platform as well as the simplistic Google Cardboard. Now, it is also working on another secretive VR project. Only time will tell whether Google’s VR initiative will follow in the footsteps of Google Plus; however, unlike chat where they had a major head-start and still failed, they are now starting behind other companies that have made leaps and bounds in the space (i.e., Facebook, Samsung, HTC). Live Video Live video seems to be another “hot” trend in tech. Companies like Periscope, Facebook Live videos, Meerkat, Snapchat (near-live), Twitch, have built massive platforms that allow users to easily stream content live. These platforms are becoming areas for massive advertising spend (e.g., look at all the brands developing content for Snapchat) and commerce (e.g., look at all the money spent on Twitch every day). With YouTube, Google has access to the largest online video streaming platform in the world with the best technology and a very captive audience. They had and still have every opportunity in the world to dominate the live video market. We’re still seeing Google play out its move here but it looks like, once again, they are failing at execution. It seems like user generated live video is only an afterthought on YouTube and it is very hard to use. You have to be a verified user to use the platform AND you can’t actually use your mobile phone to create the videos (being able to use your phone is a MUST for live video). Just as with chat, that Google isn’t putting much effort or focus evolving their video platform where they have a massive competitive advantage. Where they are focusing their energy and efforts is on their “unplugged” service, which will allow people to stream TV on YouTube. Though I’m sure this will bring in a good chunk of change for the company, it is merely prolonging the death of traditional TV as we know it rather than focusing on new forms of content creation. Google is putting all of its eggs in the wrong basket. Technical Infrastructure As the biggest tech company in the world, Google, naturally, had to build up a massive and sophisticated technical infrastructure. Google’s data centers span the entire world with millions of servers running the most advanced operating systems and server technology. However, it is Amazon that dominates cloud computing with it’s $10 billion a year cloud computing business, Amazon Web Services (its most profitable division). Once again, here Google wasn’t able to capitalize on an opportunity that it was in a prime position for — Amazon Web Services launched in 2006 while a very basic form of Google’s Cloud Platform was launched in 2010. Though Google is finally catching up in this space, its revenue is still a third of Amazon’s and there are a number of very innovative players entering this already crowded market. And the bad news is that search won’t last forever Just like everything in our rapidly evolving tech world, search, as we know it, won’t last forever. The world of search is changing and Google can’t rely on it’s traditional approach to remain dominant in the world of search. Where people search is changing. For example, more people than ever are now searching on social platforms to get their news and content. Just yesterday, I heard that one of my idols, Muhammad Ali, had passed away. Where did I first hear about this? Facebook. Where was the first place I went to search to find out more? Twitter. Not Google. How people search is also changing. The future of search will make it easier for people to bypass the outdated step of “Googling” something and getting exactly what they want in an easier way. Take a look at how Amazon’s Echo/Alexa (Siri as well, but I don’t find it to be as good of an example as it is less advanced) is changing the world search. With a more and more things becoming “connected” in our world — do you think people will still open up their computers and phones as much to “Google” something? There will be easier ways to put the exact information you’re looking for right at your fingertips. We’re still in the early stages of seeing search evolve here but I am certain that how we search will significantly shift away in the next five years away from the traditional method of “Googling”. Google won’t be able to use search as a crutch to support itself despite continuously failing to innovate and execute. Avoiding the Paradox of Plenty All hope is not lost for Google. As the largest company in the world boasting $100 billion in cash and some of the brightest talent in the world, Google can still avoid the slow doom that is befalling Microsoft (very similar story to Google with failures in all of the same spaces yet have Windows to support them). In order to avoid the paradox of plenty, Google needs to start thinking like a startup. Startups that are successful have a big vision but are hell-bent on executing successfully, they focus on their core competencies rather than getting carried away in a million directions, and they build cultures that foster hungry people driven on making a change. Similarly, Google needs to: Focus on better execution Many years ago, I worked as a consultant at Google and I remember the constant usage of the word “moonshot” strategy — referring to their strategy of coming up with a huge vision (I believe this probably came from Google X’s moonshot investments) around projects to take over the world. Though no company can survive without a big vision, a company with a big vision needs to be coupled with strong execution for it to succeed. Across all of the examples above Google’s vision was spot-on but failed miserably at the tactical level. Google needs to focus more on the downstream execution and ensure that each of their products is built to perfection (I can list of many of their current products that are far from this *cough* *cough* Android) and puts the customer at the center of their development process (many of their pitfalls could have been avoided if they just did better user testing). Better leverage it’s core competencies Google seems like they’ve got their fingers in every pie possible. In an age where one can no longer cleanly silo a tech company into a specific industry, companies can no longer keep blinders on to activity in adjacent sectors. However, Google needs to better focus on its core competencies— the companies that fall under Google and not under Alphabet. In fact, though there’s a lot of fanfare around Google acquisitions and forays into different fields, companies not named Google make up just 6 percent of the entire tech conglomeration’s workforce, but they account for a growing share of its headaches (see latest news on Nest). Take the example of Gmail — a core Google product that is ripe for disruption. Gmail hasn’t changed at all for years (except for the tabs that now show up) — though Google has an extremely loyal (mainly because all the other options suck) user base, it has done nothing to improve the product at all. One such improvement could be the development of a real platform — al la Slack-style with Gmail…they had a half-hearted attempted with Gmail Labs but nothing they’ve really focused on. It frustrates me every day when I sign into my email to think about all the missed opportunity there. Google needs to find a way to upgrade its core products and lverage its competitive advantage with the data and users it has to make these products invincible. Undergo a cultural shift Finally, Google needs to undergo a change in their culture. In addition to becoming a more execution-focused company, my limited experience when consulting with Google as well as in discussions around this topic with a number of their employees is that Google has culturally become a complacent company. At the micro-level, people have become very comfortable with Google’s top spot in the tech world. It’s not unheard of to hear about world-class engineers who show up to work in time for a free lunch, then take a nap in one of the sleep stations provided by the firm, then work for a few hours and go back home. Project timelines often get pushed back for months and months at a time (something I witnessed during my time consulting there) with no real consequences or accountability. Compare that to Amazon where Jeff Bezos has instilled a culture where “everyday is day one”. Though Amazon is a behemoth of a company as well, this mindset of grinding hard and focus on maniacal perfection is instilled in all employees from the moment they walk through the doors of the office.
image url: 
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*AzIvroSinRSi4pW5lxRf5A.png

A Day In The Life Of A Crystal Healer

$
0
0
We’re loving this hilarious and heartfelt day in the life of the pro crystal healer behind Energy Muse… This post is part of an ongoing collaboration with The Chalkboard Mag. It’s dawn; do you know where your hawk feather is? Most of us spend the foggy first moments of our day stumbling towards a coffee mug, but for Heather Askinosie of Energy Muse, an early morning ancient purification ritual is as normal as can be. The daily life of a professional crystal healer is – as you might expect – miles from ordinary, but wellness and weirdness often go hand in hand and we’re all about owning your quirks (check out Heather’s tips for that here). Read on for a (hilarious!) glimpse inside a “normal” day in Heather’s world. You may emerge with some surprising inspo… My son Orion came up behind me looking over my shoulder and asked me what I was doing. “I am writing about a typical day in my life.” “But you don’t have typical days,” he said. “Your days aren’t normal like other people.” “What do you mean by that?” “Here’s an example… remember at school when we were studying the history of Indians?” I nodded yes, “I remember” “Well, I come home one day after school and there one is. A real Chumash Indian in my living room with a huge whalebone lying on the floor. She is boiling herbs in the kitchen, drinking coffee and talking about her tribe. You made me show her my homework, and it just so happens that it was the day we studied Chumash Indians!! She tells me that all the information that I am being taught in school is wrong and not true. The reason she knows this is because her great, great, great grandfather was in the tribe they were talking about in my history book. I can guarantee you that nobody else in my school came home and had that happen to them.” “I agree that was a coincidence.” “A coincidence? That’s a typical day for you,” he said. Maybe he is right. A typical day for me is not typical… 4:30 a.m. I normally wake up at 5 a.m.  I have been told this is a good time to meditate since the Earth is still quiet and you are closer to God at this time. Right when I wake up and drink a glass of Rudraksha seed bead water. Before I go to bed every night, I place three five-faced Rudrashka’s in a glass of water and let it soak over night. I drink for this every morning for good health, purification and a stronger auric shield. Once a month I get up at 4:30 a.m. so I can participate remotely in a Green Tara Puja in Malaysia to learn more about this Tibetan deity. A puja is a ritual or ceremony that helps you have a deeper spiritual connection with the divine. She is known to be the swift liberator and the Bodhisattva of compassion. You can call upon her to help you in any area of your life that you need assistance. Her mantra is: Om tuttare ture svaha. To prepare for the puja, I have saffron water, flowers, food offerings, fragrances, incense and her image on my altar. 6:20 a.m. Each and every morning, while my family is sleeping I play a CD of Sanskrit purification and cleansing mantras. I then walk through every room in my house with my hawk feather and cleanse it with a sacred smoke blend of frankincense, sage and copal. I open up a few doors and windows so that when my family wakes up, the smoke is gone. 6:40 a.m. After cleansing, I head to my sacred room (yes, I have a whole room filled with crystals, sacred geometry, images of spiritual masters and an altar). I light a tea light candle as a sign to God that I am ready to pray. I then get comfortable sitting on a meditation cushion, which is under my eight-foot tall copper pyramid, and place four black shungite cubes on each side to keep me grounded. I hold two selenite rods in my hands for liquid light and expansion and meditate for 20 minutes.  My meditations vary depending on what I am studying at the time. Currently, I start my morning with transcendental meditation that I learned 25 years ago. 7:00 a.m. Get kids fed, packed and off to school. This is when the early morning prayers and meditation pay off. I leave my hours of bliss and become a drill sergeant. Did you get your homework? Brush your teeth? Don’t forget your lunch. Remember you have your tutor today. This list is endless and continues until they walk out the door. Sometimes the mornings are so chaotic, I do another round of sageing and purification mantras. I often wonder what it would be like if I didn’t do this stuff; the thought alone scares me. 9:00 a.m. I head to Core Power Yoga. I really love hot yoga. I come in, lay my mat down, add some crystals to the front of my mat for expansion and I am done in an hour. When I have more time, Kundalini is my preferred yoga as it has literally changed my mind. 11:30 a.m. I’m an information and knowledge junkie, so I usually spend part of my day meeting with some type of healer, teacher, guru or shaman to pick their brain for ancient secrets. This week, I went to Chinatown and met with several Chinese medicine herbalists to discuss ear acupuncture and herbal formulas. My particular interest was gathering more information on what point on the ear acupuncture helps with stress reduction. I learned about the shen men point, which is considered a divine gate in the ear and helps treat anxiety, stress and depression. While I was there, I also picked up 10 pairs of slippers. When people come to visit my home, they can take off their shoes and put on slippers, so that negative energy no longer enters my house on the soles of people’s shoes. Last week, I was making calls to scholars and healers in Hawaii familiar with the ancient Hawaiian chants and the ancient healing ways, to gather information regarding the elements of the Earth and how kahunas worked these elements to heal people on a spiritual level. In general, I trust my gut when I am intuitively called to study something, meet certain people or be open to something new. 12:45 p.m. 12: 45 I am focusing on an upgrade of the brain diet, which includes more greens, minimal carbs, less sugar, more good fats. After 40, it’s all about feeding our cells, feeding the brain and switching back on the repair switches in the body that start to turn off as we age. I’ll find try to find a moment to pause to get in my daily brain-boosting foods. 2:15 p.m. I go to my office at Energy Muse to meet with a client for a crystal stone reading. Each reading lasts an hour and is a very powerful way to tap into your soul’s purpose. Many people have said that one stone reading gets you to a breakthrough point similar to 10 hours of therapy. You choose from hundreds of stones from all around the world. The stones you pick will give you a message from your subconscious mind, guiding you on how to make positive changes and shifts in your life. It’s not a predictive reading – it’s a soulful and transformational reading. 4:00 p.m. After a crystal healing session, I usually meet with the Energy Muse team to go over future events, social media outreach and purchasing new crystals for our showroom and website. 7:30 p.m. This is our family time. Every night we take an hour to eat together and share the events of our day. It’s important to always reconnect as a family, especially when everyone’s lives are going in so many directions during the day. My dog Sirius has epilepsy, so he gets a crystal energy treatment during the week. He likes when I lay malachite and selenite over his belly. This makes him feel calm – he lays there for at least 10 minutes without the stones falling off, with a big snaggle-toothed smile. 9:00 p.m. I take an aura cleansing bath with sea salt, apple cider vinegar and baking soda. As I get into the bath, all the day’s events, people and mental projections are cleared from my energy field. 9:30 p.m. I head to bed and lay with a piece of rose quartz over my heart. I also use a Quantum Wave Laser by laying it over my adrenals, sacrum, back of my neck and thymus for six minutes at a time. It helps to reduce stress of the day and ensure a great night’s sleep. 10:15 p.m. Right before bed, I open my gratitude journal and I list three things that I am grateful for each day as I sip a cup of ashwagandha or Spring Dragon Longevity tea. 10:30 p.m. The minute I get in bed, I feel the love. My room is gridded with rose quartz, amethyst and selenite. The energy is soothing and tranquil. My bed has been placed in my best magnetic direction for sleep and rejuvenation. As I turn out the light and give my husband a kiss goodnight, I give thanks for another day. Related
image url: 
http://hr0ah34zbrtz43ik40i9ko1c.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CrystalMandola-e1464985733351.jpg
Viewing all 1477 articles
Browse latest View live